Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410278›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

A novel Vascular Leak Index identifies sepsis patients with a higher risk for in-hospital death and fluid accumulation.

Jay Chandra, Miguel A Armengol de la Hoz, Gwendolyn Lee, Alexandria Lee, Patrick Thoral, Paul Elbers, Hyung-Chul Lee, John S Munger, Leo Anthony Celi, David A Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Systemic capillary leak syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jay Chandra *Harvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. jaychandra@college.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-0180
Miguel A Armengol de la Hoz *Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gwendolyn LeeDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexandria LeeHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick ThoralIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul ElbersIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
John S MungerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Leo Anthony CeliInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
David A KaufmanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
A novel data science and network analysis approach to quantifying facilitators and barriers of low tidal volume ventilation in an international consortium of medical centersR01HL140362 · NHLBI · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI WEISS, CURTIS H. · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
1/1: ARREST RESPIRATORY FAILURE DUE TO PNEUMONIA (ARREST PNEUMONIA)UG3HL141722 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FESTIC, EMIR, GAJIC, OGNJEN · 2019 to 2019
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140362NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL141722NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is characterized by vascular leak. Treatment for sepsis, specifically intravenous fluids, may worsen deterioration in the context of vascular leak. We therefore sought to quantify vascular leak in sepsis patients to guide fluid resuscitation.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of sepsis patients in four ICU databases in North America, Europe, and Asia. We developed an intuitive vascular leak index (VLI) and explored the relationship between VLI and in-hospital death and fluid balance using generalized additive models (GAM).

resultsUsing a GAM, we found that increased VLI is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death. Patients with a VLI in the highest quartile (Q4), across the four datasets, had a 1.61-2.31 times increased odds of dying in the hospital compared to patients with a VLI in the lowest quartile (Q1). VLI Q2 and Q3 were also associated with increased odds of dying. The relationship between VLI, treated as a continuous variable, and in-hospital death and fluid balance was statistically significant in the three datasets with large sample sizes. Specifically, we observed that as VLI increased, there was increase in the risk for in-hospital death and 36-84 h fluid balance.

conclusionsOur VLI identifies groups of patients who may be at higher risk for in-hospital death or for fluid accumulation. This relationship persisted in models developed to control for severity of illness and chronic comorbidities.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticFluid TherapyHospital MortalityHumansRetrospective StudiesFluid balanceFluid resuscitationHematocritMortalitySeptic shockVascular leak

Identifiers

PMID35410278
PMCPMC9003991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.