ArticleBMC women's health2022
The best postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage cervical adenosquamous carcinoma.
Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting autophagy promotes the antitumor effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer cells.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) was previously thought to be a subtype of cervical adenocarcinoma, but recent studies have found that the clinical features of the two diseases are different. Moreover, the pathological characteristics, survival, prognosis, and optimal ASC therapy remain unknown. This study aims to retrospectively analyze the postoperative survival of patients with early-stage ASC and to evaluate their condition after treatment with postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area.
methodsThis study enrolled 131 patients with pathologically confirmed ASC screened from 3502 patients with confirmed stage I-II cervical cancer diagnosis who had completed surgical treatments in our hospital. Among the 131 enrolled patients, 75 patients received CCRT, 33 patients received chemotherapy (CT), and 23 patients did not receive adjuvant treatment (named surgery alone (S alone). Of the 75 patients CCRT, 43 patients received prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area. The efficacy of the postoperative treatments of patients among groups (CCRT, CT, and S alone) was compared.
resultsThe median follow-up time, age, and overall survival (OS) were 76 months, 43 years, and 74 months, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82% and 71.4%, respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 64 months. Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities and positive lymph node metastases were associated with OS and DFS. Patients who received CCRT treatment had higher OS and DFS than those with CT and S alone. Prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area did not improve the OS and DFS of patients with CCRT treatment. However, further subgroup analysis suggested that it might improve survival rates in patients who had positive pelvic lymph nodes as confirmed by postoperative pathology.
conclusionPostoperative CCRT improved the survival rates in patients with early-stage ASC. The value of prophylactic irradiation of the para-aortic lymphatic drainage area remains debatable, but it may benefit patients with pelvic lymph node involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.