Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410228›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

Predictive modeling of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) in vitro proliferation media using machine learning approaches: a comparative study of ANN, KNN and GEP models.

Mohammad Sadat-Hosseini, Mohammad M Arab, Mohammad Soltani, Maliheh Eftekhari, Amanollah Soleimani, Kourosh Vahdati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clonal Propagation of Walnuts (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Sadat-HosseiniDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran. m.hosseini@ujiroft.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7919-3532
Mohammad M ArabDepartment of Horticulture, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad SoltaniDepartment of Irrigation and Draintage Engineering, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Maliheh EftekhariDepartment of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
Amanollah SoleimaniDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.
Kourosh VahdatiDepartment of Horticulture, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimizing plant tissue culture media is a complicated process, which is easily influenced by genotype, mineral nutrients, plant growth regulators (PGRs), vitamins and other factors, leading to undesirable and inefficient medium composition. Facing incidence of different physiological disorders such as callusing, shoot tip necrosis (STN) and vitrification (Vit) in walnut proliferation, it is necessary to develop prediction models for identifying the impact of different factors involving in this process. In the present study, three machine learning (ML) approaches including multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and gene expression programming (GEP) were implemented and compared to multiple linear regression (MLR) to develop models for prediction of in vitro proliferation of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.). The accuracy of developed models was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R

resultsOur results indicated that all three ML techniques had higher accuracy of prediction than MLR, for example, calculated R

conclusionHere, besides MLPNN and GEP, KNN also is introduced, for the first time, as a simple technique with high accuracy to be used for developing prediction models in optimizing plant tissue culture media composition studies. Therefore, selection of the modeling technique to study depends on the researcher's desire regarding the simplicity of the procedure, obtaining clear results as entire formula and/or less time to analyze.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkGene expression programmingk-nearest neighborsPrediction modelWalnut in vitro propagation

Identifiers

PMID35410228
PMCPMC8996408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.