Trial reportBMC medical education2022
Effects of bedside team-based learning on pediatric clinical practice in Chinese medical students.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Application of a modified Peyton's four-step approach in clinical skills training for residents: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- An integrated mini-CEX and OSCE assessment model for optimizing standardized training in department of hepatobiliary surgery.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Team-based vs. problem-based learning in undergraduate surgery: a randomized controlled trial in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pecha Kucha in medical education: a narrative literature review.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Review
- Investigating students' perceptions of the medical education environment and learning autonomy in blended learning in pediatrics: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The application effect of the segmented teaching method in training medical students on clinical practice skills.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students-a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Case Report-Driven Medical Education in Rural Family Medicine Education: A Thematic Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Application of Mental Health Teaching Method and Special Teaching Method in College Chinese Teaching under the Network Environment.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBedside teaching is a primary educational tool to improve the clinical practice of medical students. As a new medical pedagogical approach, team-based learning (TBL) is gradually being integrated into Chinese medical education programmes to promote clinical reasoning, knowledge application, teamwork and collaboration. The aim of this controlled study is to investigate the effects of TBL on pediatric bedside teaching in medical students.
methodsThirty medical students in pediatric clinical practice were randomly assigned to an intervention and a control group. Students in the intervention group exposed bedside teaching activity with TBL while students in the control group received traditional bedside teaching. Teaching for the two groups was conducted biweekly, and the same clinical cases were selected for both groups with the same instructors. After six months of clinical practice, the differences of learning outcomes between the two groups were compared through assessments by computer-based case simulations (CCS) and mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX). Student feedback following completion of bedside teaching was collected by questionnaire.
resultsThe CCS scores in the intervention group were significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The mini-CEX results showed that clinical judgment and counseling skills of the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.01). Medical interviewing skills and overall clinical competence in the intervention group were better than those in the control group (p < 0.05). In the questionnaire survey, students in the intervention group believed that bedside teaching activity with TBL could promote active learning ability, improve counseling skills and strengthen teamwork.
conclusionsApplication of TBL in bedside teaching not only enhanced clinical practice skills among medical students but also improved their clinical reasoning and counseling skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.