Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410161›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2.

Irene M Kaplow, Abhimanyu Banerjee, Chuan Sheng Foo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Benefiting from the intrinsic role of epigenetics to predict patterns of CTCF binding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene M KaplowDepartments of Computer Science, Stanford University, 240 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California, 94305, USA. ikaplow@cs.stanford.edu.
Abhimanyu BanerjeeDepartments of Physics, Stanford University, 240 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.
Chuan Sheng FooDepartments of Computer Science, Stanford University, 240 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California, 94305, USA. csfoo@cs.stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USInstitute for Infocomm Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany transcription factors (TFs), such as multi zinc-finger (ZF) TFs, have multiple DNA binding domains (DBDs), and deciphering the DNA binding motifs of individual DBDs is a major challenge. One example of such a TF is CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a TF with eleven ZFs that plays a variety of roles in transcriptional regulation, most notably anchoring DNA loops. Previous studies found that CTCF ZFs 3-7 bind CTCF's core motif and ZFs 9-11 bind a specific upstream motif, but the motifs of ZFs 1-2 have yet to be identified.

resultsWe developed a new approach to identifying the binding motifs of individual DBDs of a TF through analyzing chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments in which a single DBD is mutated: we train a deep convolutional neural network to predict whether wild-type TF binding sites are preserved in the mutant TF dataset and interpret the model. We applied this approach to mouse CTCF ChIP-seq data and identified the known binding preferences of CTCF ZFs 3-11 as well as a putative GAG binding motif for ZF 1. We analyzed other CTCF datasets to provide additional evidence that ZF 1 is associated with binding at the motif we identified, and we found that the presence of the motif for ZF 1 is associated with CTCF ChIP-seq peak strength.

conclusionsOur approach can be applied to any TF for which in vivo binding data from both the wild-type and mutated versions of the TF are available, and our findings provide new potential insights binding preferences of CTCF's DBDs.

Indexed as

Transcription FactorsZincAnimalsBinding SitesCCCTC-Binding FactorDNAMiceNeural Networks, ComputerProtein BindingZinc FingersCCCTC-Binding FactorDNATranscription FactorsZincBinding strengthCTCFDeep neural networkMotifMutated transcription factorZinc finger

Identifiers

PMID35410161
PMCPMC9004084
OpenAlexW4226132927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.