Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410091›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Experts' Opinion for Improving Pertussis Vaccination Rates in Adolescents and Adults: A Call to Action.

Giovanni Gabutti, Irene Cetin, Michele Conversano, Claudio Costantino, Paolo Durando, Sandro Giuffrida

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Clinical features and epidemiological significance of pertussis in infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni GabuttiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Public Health Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-4923
Irene CetinObstetrics and Gynecology, Department "Woman, Mother and Child"-ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Buzzi Children' Hospital, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-3034
Michele ConversanoDepartment of Prevention, ASL of Taranto, 74121 Taranto, Italy.
Claudio CostantinoDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Excellence Specialties, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3397-7331
Paolo DurandoOccupational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-5176
Sandro GiuffridaDepartment of Prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3183-0421
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Reggio Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article highlights the importance of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (with reduced antigen content, dTap) vaccination in preventing pertussis, a respiratory infection that is still widespread and easily transmitted. In particular, it highlights the need to receive a booster vaccination throughout life to maintain high antibody levels, which decrease through time. This document collects the opinions that emerged from the comparison between major Italian experts in the field of vaccination. This working group was created to promote a "call to action", aimed at raising awareness among all institutions, public health authorities, and health workers involved in the vaccination process, about the importance of dTap vaccine administration and with the mindset of implementing the strategic vaccination plan provided by the National Vaccine Plan (NVP). In fact, despite this vaccine being included in the NVP, there are some issues attributable to the practice of vaccination (local health authorities, vaccination centers, occupational health services, gynecology centers, societies of work). Therefore, it is necessary that the Ministry defines the vaccination coverage objectives, identifies the groups of subjects who should receive the booster vaccine (subjects exposed to greater risk of infection, subjects over 60, pregnant women), and applies all the necessary measures to encourage the implementation of this practice.

Indexed as

DiphtheriaDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesTetanusWhooping CoughAdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineFemaleHumansPregnancyVaccinationAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccinedTap vaccinepertussispertussis booster for adultspertussis immunity durationpertussis immunizationpertussis vaccinepertussis vaccine in pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35410091
PMCPMC8998413
OpenAlexW4223531996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.