Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410065›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The State of the Evidence about the Family and Community Nurse: A Systematic Review.

Federica Dellafiore, Rosario Caruso, Michela Cossu, Sara Russo, Irene Baroni, Serena Barello, Ida Vangone, Marta Acampora, Gianluca Conte, Arianna Magon and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Community Health Assessment Tools Adoptable in Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Federica DellafioreSection of Hygiene, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8220-8347
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-6209
Michela CossuRsa Attanasio, Rsa Limbiate, 20812 Milan, Italy.
Sara RussoNursing Degree Course, Section Istituti Clinici di Pavia e Vigevano S.p.A., University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-2677
Irene BaroniHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy.
Serena BarelloEngageMinds HUB, Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-2563
Ida VangoneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00173 Rome, Italy.
Marta AcamporaEngageMinds HUB, Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Gianluca ConteHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8171-8203
Arianna MagonHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-6940
Alessandro StievanoCentre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, OPI Rome, 00173 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3508-2352
Cristina ArrigoniSection of Hygiene, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increase in chronic degenerative diseases poses many challenges to the efficacy and sustainability of healthcare systems, establishing the family and community nurse (FCN) who delivers primary care as a strategic role. FCNs, indeed, can embrace the complexity of the current healthcare demand, sustain the ageing of the population, and focus on illness prevention and health promotion, ensuring a continuous and coordinated integration between hospitals and primary care ser. The literature on FCNs is rich but diverse. This study aimed to critically summarise the literature about the FCN, providing an overall view of the recent evidence.

methodsA state-of-art systematic review was performed on PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus, employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and checklist to guide the search and reporting.

resultsFive interpretative themes emerged from the 90 included articles: clinical practice, core competencies, outcomes, Organisational and educational models, and advanced training program.

conclusionsFCNs can make a major contribution to a population's health, playing a key role in understanding and responding to patients' needs. Even if the investment in prevention does not guarantee immediate required strategies and foresight on the part of decisionmakers, it is imperative to invest more political, institutional, and economic resources to support and ensure the FCNs' competencies and their professional autonomy.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareModels, EducationalHospitalsHumanscommunity nursefamily nursepatient-centred carestate-of-art systematic review

Identifiers

PMID35410065
PMCPMC8998909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.