ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06506747 (Clinical Evaluation of FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry for Assessing Implant Positions Compared to Standard Stereophotogrammetry), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Evaluation of FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry for Assessing Implant Positions Compared to Standard Stereophotogrammetry
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigations of Intraoral Scan Body Extensions. Effect of Design on the Accuracy, Usability, and Feasibility for Digital Full-Arch Implant Scans In Vitro.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- In Vivo Complete Arch Implant Impressions: Comparison of the Linear Precision of Digital and Conventional Techniques.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Stereophotogrammetry Technique versus Intraoral Scanners for Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Enhancing the accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions via segmentation: An in vitro study.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Effect of the scan body alignment process on the accuracy of virtual definitive implant casts: a pilot study.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2025Article
- Influence of camera position, implant angulation and implant reference on the accuracy of complete arch implant recordings with photogrammetry.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2025Article
- Comparison of photogrammetric imaging, intraoral scanning and conventional impression accuracy of full-arch dental implant rehabilitation: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Trueness of tooth modified scan bodies as a novel technique for edentulous full arch implant supported dental prosthesis: an in vivo prospective comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
- Periodontal Healing with Fixed Restorations Using the Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique Combined with a Full Digital Workflow: A Clinical Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Multiple in vitro studies reported insufficient accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for complete-arch multiple implant impression. The aim of the study is to analyze the precision of three IOSs, PIC dental (Pic dental, Iditec North West SL), TRIOS 3 (3Shape), and True Definition (Midmark Corporation) and the influence of several factors in the edentulous complete maxillary and mandibular arch. (2) A fully edentulous patient with eight implants in the maxillary and in the mandibular jaw was selected. Five impressions were taken per system and arch. A suprastructure was designed on each digital working cast. The precision was analyzed comparing each of the 28 distances and seven relative angulations of the abutments of all the designed suprastructures. The descriptive statistics, the Student's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.