ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
An Evaluation Index System of Basic Elderly Care Services Based on the Perspective of Accessibility.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 1-km resolution dataset of affordability-constrained accessibility to elderly care facilities in China.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Research on the allocation efficiency of integrated medical and older adult care institutions using the Malmquist productivity index.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Nursing Education Innovation on the Quality of Care for Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review Based on Student Competency Development.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Innovative development model for high quality elderly care: A study of "chain + virtual elderly care" services in Hengyang City.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- The construction of an evaluation index system for the health vulnerability of frail and vulnerable older persons in nursing homes: a Delphi study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Home-Based Community Elderly Care Quality Indicators in China: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Construction of a performance evaluation index system for the management of chronic diseases based on medical and preventive integration.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Impact of Accessibility of Community Elderly Care Services on Quality of Life of the Elderly.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring supply and demand imbalance of community-based older adult care: an observational study in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Construction of community home-based older adult care service model based on modular design concept.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Bridging accessibility gaps in urban community-based basic older adult care: a comprehensive framework validated in Xi'an, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Research on the assignment of elderly care service personnel with time window constraints.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Study on the measurement of coupling and coordinated development level between China's internet and elderly care services and its influencing factors.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Identification of formation mechanism and key elements of quality geriatric care behavior of nursing assistants in nursing homes: a grounded theory study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Digital village construction, human capital and the development of the rural older adult care service industry.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Promoting the Integration of Elderly Healthcare and Elderly Nursing: Evidence from the Chinese Government.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Autonomous Capacity of the Elderly Population in Spain for Shopping and Preparing Meals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population aging has become more and more severe in many countries. As a result, the demand for basic elderly care services has risen. The establishment of an evaluation index system for basic elderly care services can provide guidelines for governments to improve the quality of such services. Based on the "5A" theoretical analysis framework of Penchansky and Thomas, this paper introduces the concept of "accessibility" into evaluation. The "accessibility" model of services, through a literature review, field research, and three rounds of expert correspondence, consists of three first-level indicators, including the accessibility of home-based community elderly care services, the accessibility of institutional elderly care services, and the accessibility of administrative services. The evaluation index system of 15 s-level indicators and 70 third-level indicators, using AHP to determine the weight value of each indicator, provides a quantitative basis for the quality evaluation and improvement of basic elderly care services. Based on our quantitative results, policy recommendations are put forward: strengthen the support for the human and financial resources of community home-based elderly care services; improve the affordability of basic elderly care services; increase the types and numbers of institutional elderly care service projects; improve the availability and adaptability of institutional elderly care services; improve the accessibility of administrative services so that elderly care service institutions and elderly care administrative agencies can establish an effective communication and feedback mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.