Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409893›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Adolescent COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making among Parents in Southern California.

Suellen Hopfer, Emilia J Fields, Magdalen Ramirez, Sorina Neang Long, Heather C Huszti, Adrijana Gombosev, Bernadette Boden-Albala, Dara H Sorkin, Dan M Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Global Systematic Scoping Review of Adolescent Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suellen HopferDepartment of Health, Society & Behavior, Program in Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Emilia J FieldsDepartment of Health, Society & Behavior, Program in Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Magdalen RamirezDepartment of Health, Society & Behavior, Program in Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Sorina Neang LongDepartment of Health, Society & Behavior, Program in Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Heather C HusztiPediatric Psychology, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC), Orange, CA 92686, USA.
Adrijana GombosevInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Bernadette Boden-AlbalaDepartment of Health, Society & Behavior, Program in Public Health, School of Population and Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Dara H SorkinInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Dan M CooperInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USChildren's Hospital of Orange County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent COVID-19 vaccination has stalled at 53% in the United States. Vaccinating adolescents remains critical to preventing the continued transmission of COVID-19, the emergence of variants, and rare but serious disease in children, and it is the best preventive measure available to return to in-person schooling. We investigated parent-adolescent COVID-19 vaccine decision-making. Between 24 February and 15 March 2021, we conducted surveys and 12 focus groups with 46 parent-adolescent dyads in Southern California. Parents and adolescents completed a survey prior to participation in a focus group discussion, which focused on exploring COVID-19 vaccine acceptance or uncertainty and was guided by the 5C vaccine hesitancy model. Parents uncertain about vaccinating adolescents expressed low vaccine confidence and high COVID-19 disease risk complacency. Parents who accepted COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents expressed high confidence in health authority vaccine recommendations, high perceived COVID-19 risk, and collective responsibility to vaccinate children. Additionally, unique pandemic-related factors of vaccine acceptance included vaccinating for emotional health, resuming social activities, and vaccine mandates. Among parents, 46% were willing to vaccinate their adolescent, 11% were not, and 43% were unsure. Among adolescents, 63% were willing to vaccinate. Despite vaccine availability, 47% of adolescents remain unvaccinated against COVID-19. Factors associated with vaccine uncertainty and acceptability inform health care practitioner, school, community, and public health messaging to reach parents and adolescents.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdolescentCaliforniaChildCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines5C vaccine hesitancy modeladolescent COVID-19 vaccinationparent vaccine decision-makingpublic health vaccine communicationvaccine acceptancevaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID35409893
PMCPMC8998887
OpenAlexW4223489289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.