Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409869›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Drug Prescriptions among Italian and Immigrant Pregnant Women Resident in Italy: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study.

Paola D'Aloja, Roberto Da Cas, Valeria Belleudi, Filomena Fortinguerra, Francesca Romana Poggi, Serena Perna, Francesco Trotta, Serena Donati, MoM-Net Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antidiabetic Therapy during Pregnancy: The Prescription Pattern in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Pharmacotherapy during Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Lactation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paola D'AlojaNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Institute of Health), 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5780-0277
Roberto Da CasNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Institute of Health), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Valeria BelleudiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00145 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8286-443X
Filomena FortinguerraHTA & Pharmaceutical Economy Division, Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), 00187 Rome, Italy.
Francesca Romana PoggiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00145 Rome, Italy.
Serena PernaHTA & Pharmaceutical Economy Division, Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), 00187 Rome, Italy.
Francesco TrottaHTA & Pharmaceutical Economy Division, Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), 00187 Rome, Italy.
Serena DonatiNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Institute of Health), 00161 Rome, Italy.
MoM-Net Group
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITItalian Medicines Agency · ITAgenzia Regionale Parchi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring drug safety for pregnant women through prescription drug monitoring is essential. The aim of this study was to describe the prescription pattern of medicines among pregnant immigrant women from countries with high migratory pressure (HMPCs) compared to pregnant Italian women. The prevalence of drug prescriptions among the two study populations was analysed through record linkage procedures applied to the administrative databases of eight Italian regions, from 2016 to 2018. The overall prevalence of drug prescription was calculated considering all women who received at least one prescription during the study period. Immigrants had a lower prevalence of drug prescriptions before (51.0% vs. 58.6%) and after pregnancy (55.1% vs. 60. 3%). Conversely, during pregnancy, they obtained a slightly higher number of prescriptions (74.9% vs. 72.8%). The most prescribed class of drugs was the blood and haematopoietic organs category (category ATC B) (56.4% vs. 45.9%, immigrants compared to Italians), followed by antimicrobials (31.3% vs. 33.7%). Most prescriptions were appropriate, while folic acid administration 3 months before conception was low for both study groups (3.9% immigrants and 6.2% Italians). Progesterone seemingly was prescribed against early pregnancy loss, more frequently among Italians (16.5% vs. 8.1% immigrants). Few inappropriate medications were prescribed among antihypertensives, statins and anti-inflammatory drugs in both study groups.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsPrescription DrugsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansItalyPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrescription Drugsdrug prescriptionimmigrantsinappropriate prescribingpharmacoepidemiologypregnant womenprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35409869
PMCPMC8998753
OpenAlexW4221057602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.