Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409862›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Adoption of Health Mobile Apps during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Health Belief Model Approach.

Nouf Sahal Alharbi, Amany Shlyan AlGhanmi, Mochammad Fahlevi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Community Services and Social Involvement in COVID-19 Governance: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nouf Sahal AlharbiDepartment of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4431-3303
Amany Shlyan AlGhanmiDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Jeddah 93499, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-3718
Mochammad FahleviManagement Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-8308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the adoption of the Sehha, Mawid, and Tetamman mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. The present study investigated factors influencing app use intention based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) approach. This study was conducted using a sample of 176 participants from the Riyadh and Makkah regions during the lockdown in May 2020. This study uses structural equation modeling for data collected using SmartPLS 3.3.9 (GmbH, Oststeinbek, Germany) to examine the effect of constructs on the model. The most important predictor was the perceived benefits of the mobile health apps, followed by self-efficacy. The perceived barriers and cues to action have no significant effect on behavioral intention. The perceived benefits and self-efficacy as keys can provide an overview to the government and to health organizations for taking into account the most important factors of the adoption of mobile health apps, meaning that the developer must adjust to the characteristics of the community of people that need applications that provide many benefits and have an impact.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlHealth Belief ModelHumansPandemicsadoptioncoronavirusCOVID-19Health Belief ModelMHealth appmobile applicationsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID35409862
PMCPMC8998638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.