Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409860›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review.

Sanja Kezic, Roberto Nunez, Željka Babić, Sarah Hallmann, Martin S Havmose, Jeanne D Johansen, Swen M John, Marija Macan, Cara Symanzik, Wolfgang Uter and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sanja KezicAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roberto NunezAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-6574
Željka BabićInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, HR 10001 Zagreb, Croatia.
Sarah HallmannDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Martin S HavmoseNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, 2900 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeanne D JohansenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, 2900 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Swen M JohnDepartment of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-9458
Marija MacanInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, HR 10001 Zagreb, Croatia.
Cara SymanzikDepartment of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4090-6726
Wolfgang UterDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4498-3710
Patricia WeinertInstitute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), Osnabrück University, 10777 Berlin, Germany.
Rajka TurkInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, HR 10001 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5876-8923
Jelena MacanInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, HR 10001 Zagreb, Croatia.
Henk F van der MolenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0719-2020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExposure to hazardous chemicals released during hairdressing activities from hair care products puts hairdressers at risk of adverse health effects. Safety assessments of hair products are mainly focused on consumers, but exposure for professional hairdressers might be substantially higher.

objectiveTo identify and assess available research data on inhalation exposures of professional hairdressers.

methodsA systematic search of studies between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2021 was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and in Cochrane registry, toxicological dossiers of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Commission as well as the German MAK Commission. Studies reporting quantitative data on airborne concentrations of chemicals in the hairdresser's workplace were considered. The outcome was an airborne concentration of chemicals in the working environment, which was compared, when possible, with current occupational exposure limits (OEL) or guidance levels.

resultsIn total, 23 studies performed in 14 countries were included. The average number of hairdressing salons per study was 22 (range 1-62). Chemicals most frequently measured were formaldehyde (

conclusionHairdressers are exposed to a wide spectrum of hazardous chemicals, often simultaneously. Airborne concentrations of pollutants depend on salon characteristics such as ventilation and the number of customers but also on used products that are often country- or client-specific. For exposure to formaldehyde, ammonia, and TVOC exceeding OELs or guidance values for indoor air was observed. Therefore, occupational exposure should be taken into account by safety regulations for hair care products.

Indexed as

Hair PreparationsOccupational ExposureVolatile Organic CompoundsAmmoniaFormaldehydeHazardous SubstancesHumansAmmoniaFormaldehydeHair PreparationsHazardous SubstancesVolatile Organic Compoundsairborne exposurehairdressershair salonshealth effectsindoor exposureinhalation

Identifiers

PMID35409860
PMCPMC8998463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.