Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409809›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Are sEMG, Velocity and Power Influenced by Athletes' Fixation in Paralympic Powerlifting?

Ialuska Guerra, Felipe J Aidar, Gianpiero Greco, Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto, Michele De Candia, Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral, Luca Poli, Mauro Mazini Filho, Roberto Carvutto, Ana Filipa Silva and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the Asymmetry of Muscle Activation and Strength in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ialuska GuerraFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Campus of Juazeiro do Norte, Juazeiro do Norte 63040-540, Brazil.
Felipe J AidarDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Saint Cristopher 49100-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7378-4529
Gianpiero GrecoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-3721
Paulo Francisco de Almeida-NetoDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2860-2260
Michele De CandiaDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco CabralDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-9956
Luca PoliDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-8976
Mauro Mazini FilhoGraduate Program of the School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3895-6107
Roberto CarvuttoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7295
Ana Filipa SilvaEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1772-1272
Filipe Manuel ClementeEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-2842
Georgian BadicuDepartment of Physical Education and Special Motricity, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500068 Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4100-8765
Stefania CataldiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5929-4766
Francesco FischettiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8616-5372
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTSprint (United States) · USTransylvania University of Brașov · ROUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bench press is performed in parapowerlifting with the back, shoulders, buttocks, legs and heels extended over the bench, and the use of straps to secure the athlete to the bench is optional. Thus, the study evaluated muscle activation, surface electromyography (sEMG), maximum velocity (MaxV) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and power in paralympic powerlifting athletes under conditions tied or untied to the bench. Fifteen experienced Paralympic powerlifting male athletes (22.27 ± 10.30 years, 78.5 ± 21.6 kg) took part in the research. The sEMG measurement was performed in the sternal portion of the pectoralis major (PMES), anterior deltoid (AD), long head of the triceps brachii (TRI) and clavicular portion of the pectoralis major (PMCL). The MaxV, MPV and power were evaluated using an encoder. Loads of 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% 1RM were analyzed under untied and tied conditions. No differences were found in muscle activation between the tied and untied conditions; however, sEMG showed differences in the untied condition between AD and TRI (F (3112) = 4.484; p = 0.005) in the 100% 1RM load, between PMCL and AD (F (3112) = 3.743; p = 0.013) in 60% 1RM load and in the tied condition, between the PMES and the AD (F (3112) = 4.067; p = 0.009). There were differences in MaxV (F (3112) = 213.3; p < 0.001), and MPV (F (3112) = 248.2; p < 0.001), between all loads in the tied and untied condition. In power, the load of 100% 1RM differed from all other relative loads (F (3112) = 36.54; p < 0.001) in both conditions. The tied condition seems to favor muscle activation, sEMG, and velocity over the untied condition.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingWeight LiftingAthletesElectromyographyHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle Strengthbench beltsbench pressdynamic forcemuscle activationparapowerlifting

Identifiers

PMID35409809
PMCPMC8998439
OpenAlexW4220882497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.