Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409799›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

National Radon Action Plans in Europe and Need of Effectiveness Indicators: An Overview of HERCA Activities.

Francesco Bochicchio, David Fenton, Heloísa Fonseca, Marta García-Talavera, Pierrick Jaunet, Stephanie Long, Bård Olsen, Jelena Mrdakovic Popic, Wolfgang Ringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of Radon Action Plans: Searching for a Systematic and Standardised Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco BochicchioNational Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Italian National Institute of Health (ISS-Istituto Superiore di Sanità), 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1291-3037
David FentonOffice of Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Dublin 14, Ireland.
Heloísa FonsecaEmergency and Radiation Protection Department, Portuguese Environmental Agency (APA-Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente), 2610-124 Amadora, Portugal.
Marta García-TalaveraNuclear Safety Council (CSN-Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Pierrick JaunetIonizing Radiation and Health Department, French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN-Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire), 92120 Montrouge, France.
Stephanie LongOffice of Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Dublin 14, Ireland.
Bård OlsenNorwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), 1361 Østerås, Norway.
Jelena Mrdakovic PopicNorwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), 1361 Østerås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-7015
Wolfgang RingerDepartment for Radon and Radioecology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), 4020 Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protection of the population and of workers from exposure to radon is a unique challenge in radiation protection. Many coordinated actions and a variety of expertise are needed. Initially, a National Radon Action Plan (NRAP) has been developed and implemented by some countries, while it is currently recommended by international organizations (e.g., World Health Organization) and required by international regulations, such as the European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom and the International Basic Safety Standards on Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources, cosponsored by eight international organizations. Within this framework, the Heads of the European Radiological Protection Competent Authorities (HERCA) have organized activities aimed at sharing experiences to contribute toward the development and implementation of effective NRAPs. Two workshops were held in 2014 and 2015, the latter on radon in workplaces. As a follow-up to these, an online event took place in March 2021, and a second specific workshop on NRAP is planned for June 2022. These workshops were attended by experts from the competent authorities of European countries, relevant national and international organizations. The experience of several countries and the outcomes from these workshops have highlighted the need for adequate indicators of the effectiveness and progress of the actions of NRAPs, which could also be useful to implement the principle of optimization and the graded approach in NRAPs. In this paper, the activities of HERCA to support the development and implementation of effective NRAPs are described and some examples of effectiveness indicators are reported, including those already included in the NRAP of some European countries.

Indexed as

Radiation MonitoringRadiation ProtectionRadonEnvironmental ExposureEuropeHumansRadoneffectivenessindicatorsnational radon action planspolicyradioprotectionradonradon programsregulations

Identifiers

PMID35409799
PMCPMC8998705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.