Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409790›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effects of Buprenorphine Dose and Therapeutic Engagement on Illicit Opiate Use in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Trials.

Andrew W Bergen, James W Baurley, Carolyn M Ervin, Christopher S McMahan, Joe Bible, Randall S Stafford, Seshadri C Mudumbai, Andrew J Saxon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of drug liking blockade by buprenorphine subcutaneous depot (CAM2038) in participants with opioid use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew W BergenOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1237-7644
James W BaurleyBioRealm, LLC, Walnut, CA 91789, USA.
Carolyn M ErvinBioRealm, LLC, Walnut, CA 91789, USA.
Christopher S McMahanSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Joe BibleSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Randall S StaffordDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-1271
Seshadri C MudumbaiAnesthesia Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-9966
Andrew J SaxonCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
BioRealm (United States) · USClemson University · USOregon Research Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
Biosignatures of opioid addiction treatment successR43DA046325 · NIDA · BIOREALM · PI BAURLEY, JAMES WILLIAM, BERGEN, ANDREW W · 2018 to 2018
$224k
FDA HHS PMR 3033-1ANIDA NIH HHS R43 DA046325NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of agonist dose and of physician, staff and patient engagement on treatment have not been evaluated together in an analysis of treatment for opioid use disorder. Our hypotheses were that greater agonist dose and therapeutic engagement would be associated with reduced illicit opiate use in a time-dependent manner. Publicly-available treatment data from six buprenorphine efficacy and safety trials from the Federally-supported Clinical Trials Network were used to derive treatment variables. Three novel predictors were constructed to capture the time weighted effects of buprenorphine dosage (mg buprenorphine per day), dosing protocol (whether physician could adjust dose), and clinic visits (whether patient attended clinic). We used time-in-trial as a predictor to account for the therapeutic benefits of treatment persistence. The outcome was illicit opiate use defined by self-report or urinalysis. Trial participants (N = 3022 patients with opioid dependence, mean age 36 years, 33% female, 14% Black, 16% Hispanic) were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. Treatment variables dose, Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.63 (95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 0.59−0.67), dosing protocol, OR = 0.70 (95%CI 0.65−0.76), time-in-trial, OR = 0.75 (95%CI 0.71−0.80) and clinic visits, OR = 0.81 (95%CI 0.76−0.87) were significant (p-values < 0.001) protective factors. Treatment implications support higher doses of buprenorphine and greater engagement of patients with providers and clinic staff.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpiate AlkaloidsOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineOpiate Alkaloidsbuprenorphinemeta-analysisopiate substitution treatmentopioid-related disordersurinalysis

Identifiers

PMID35409790
PMCPMC8998781
OpenAlexW4221114005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.