Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409669›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Fagerström and AUDIT Tests as Probable Screening Tools in Oral Cancer and Their Correlation with

Celso Muller Bandeira, Adriana Ávila Almeida, Mônica Ghislaine Oliveira Alves, Maria Beatriz Nogueira Pascoal, José Francisco Sales Chagas, Morun Bernardino Neto, Patrícia Pimentel de Barros, Fábio Daumas Nunes, Celina Faig Lima Carta, Janete Dias Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Celso Muller BandeiraDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1343-1080
Adriana Ávila AlmeidaDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.
Mônica Ghislaine Oliveira AlvesSchool of Medicine, Anhembi Morumbi University, São José dos Campos 12230-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3411-9443
Maria Beatriz Nogueira PascoalDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas 13045-755, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9783-0822
José Francisco Sales ChagasDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas 13045-755, Brazil.
Morun Bernardino NetoDepartment of Basic Sciences and Environment, São Paulo University, São Paulo 12602-810, Brazil.
Patrícia Pimentel de BarrosDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-2811
Fábio Daumas NunesDepartment of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, São Paulo University, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-6785
Celina Faig Lima CartaDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.
Janete Dias AlmeidaDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4596-9715
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRAnhembi Morumbi University · BRFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRHospital Estadual Mário Covas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is currently a major public health problem worldwide, with a marked increase of about 70% in the number of expected diagnosed cases over the next two decades. The amount of tobacco and alcohol consumed is calculated based on the subjective information provided by the user. Tobacco exposure can be assessed using the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD) and alcohol consumption by the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-eight subjects answered the Fagerström, and AUDIT tests and we studied them as likely screening tools for oral cancer and their correlation with the expression of

resultsThere were significant differences in the AUDIT score and

conclusionsQuestionnaires designed to evaluate the degree of tobacco and alcohol exposure and dependence combined with gene expression tests can be useful to assess the risk of developing oral cancer. Furthermore, raising the awareness of individuals regarding their degree of dependence and encouraging them to participate in cessation programs are important educational measures for the prevention of tobacco-related malignancies.

Indexed as

AlcoholismMouth NeoplasmsAlcohol DrinkingCase-Control StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1Early Detection of CancerGene ExpressionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeGlutathione S-Transferase piGlutathione TransferaseHumansPolymorphism, GeneticTobacco ProductsCYP1A1 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1Glutathione S-Transferase piGlutathione TransferaseGSTP1 protein, humanbuccal mucosacarcinogenesisgene expressionmouth neoplasmssquamous cell carcinomaxenobiotic

Identifiers

PMID35409669
PMCPMC8997590
OpenAlexW4220662614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.