Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409656›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Organizational e-Health Readiness: How to Prepare the Primary Healthcare Providers' Services for Digital Transformation.

Agnieszka Kruszyńska-Fischbach, Sylwia Sysko-Romańczuk, Tomasz M Napiórkowski, Anna Napiórkowska, Dariusz Kozakiewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnieszka Kruszyńska-FischbachFaculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-0079
Sylwia Sysko-RomańczukFaculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5960-8131
Tomasz M NapiórkowskiInstitute of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna NapiórkowskaInstitute of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7818-9152
Dariusz KozakiewiczFaculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4675-4620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had two main consequences for the organization of treatment in primary healthcare: restricted patients' access to medical facilities and limited social mobility. In turn, these consequences pose a great challenge for patients and healthcare providers, i.e., the limited personal contact with medical professionals. This can be eased by new digital technology. While providing solutions to many problems, this technology poses several organizational challenges for healthcare system participants. As the current global situation and the outbreak of the humanitarian crisis in Europe show, these and other likely emergencies amplify the need to learn the lessons and prepare organizations for exceptional rapid changes. Therefore, a question arises of whether organizations are ready to use modern e-health solutions in the context of a rapidly and radically changing situation, and how this readiness can be verified. The aim of this article is to clarify the organizational e-heath readiness concept of Polish primary healthcare units. This study employs the triangulation of analytical methods, as it uses: (i) a literature review of e-health readiness assessment, (ii) primary data obtained with a survey (random sampling of 371 managers of PHC facilities across Poland) and (iii) the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method, employed to estimate the structural model. The evaluation of the model revealed that its concept was adequate for more mature entities that focus on the patient- and employee-oriented purpose of digitization, and on assuring excellent experience derived from a consistent care process. In the context of patients' restricted access to medical facilities and limited social mobility, a simpler version of the research model assesses the readiness more adequately. Finally, the study increases the knowledge base of assets (resources and capabilities), which will help healthcare systems better understand the challenges surrounding the adoption and scaling of e-health technologies.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineHealth PersonnelHumansOrganizationsPandemicsCOVID-19digital transformatione-healthinnovation in health and careorganizational readinessPLS-SEM methodprimary healthcare providers’ servicestechnology enabled care

Identifiers

PMID35409656
PMCPMC8998081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.