Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Barriers to Accessing Eye Health Services in Suburban Communities in Nampula, Mozambique.

Dulnério B Sengo, Neves A Marraca, Alcino M Muaprato, Sofía García-Sanjuan, Pablo Caballero, Inmaculada López-Izquierdo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dulnério B SengoFaculty of Health Sciences, Lúrio University, Nampula City 3100, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-9147-7589
Neves A MarracaFaculty of Health Sciences, Lúrio University, Nampula City 3100, Mozambique.
Alcino M MuapratoFaculty of Health Sciences, Lúrio University, Nampula City 3100, Mozambique.
Sofía García-SanjuanDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7985-7864
Pablo CaballeroDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-2150
Inmaculada López-IzquierdoDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3065-9896
University of Alicante · ESLúrio University · MZUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, an estimated 2.2 billion people are visually impaired (VI) or blind, and a large proportion (90%) of those affected live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to eye health services is limited. This study aimed to identify barriers to accessing eye health services and associated factors in suburban communities of Nampula. A cross-sectional community-based study was carried out on adults ≥18 years old. A total of 338 adults were randomly selected from three communities (Muthita, Piloto, and Nthotta). Individual interviews were carried out and socio-demographic data, eye symptoms, date of last eye examination, and barriers to access to eye health services were extracted. Among participants, 49.4% had eye symptoms and 41.7% did not have their eye examinations up to date. The most cited barriers were crowding in hospitals (40.7%), financial difficulties (30.0%), self-medication (20.5%), traditional treatment (17.8%), and buying eyeglasses on the street (11.6%). Barriers limited the service target to 33%. Lower levels of schooling and monthly family income and farmer occupation were statistically associated with the most barriers as risk factors. The use of eye health services was lower due to barriers to accessing eye services. More specific intervention plans and greater cooperation between sectors are needed to improve these indicators.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPersons with Visual DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth ServicesHumansMozambiquebarriers to accesseye healtheye health servicesMozambique

Identifiers

PMID35409600
PMCPMC8997994
OpenAlexW4220842178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.