Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Oneiric Activity during and after the COVID-19 Total Lockdown in Italy: A Longitudinal Study.

Maurizio Gorgoni, Serena Scarpelli, Valentina Alfonsi, Ludovica Annarumma, Elisa Pellegrini, Elisabetta Fasiello, Susanna Cordone, Aurora D'Atri, Federico Salfi, Giulia Amicucci and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sleep During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current psychiatry reports · 2022
    Review
  4. Dreaming during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maurizio GorgoniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-5483
Serena ScarpelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9260-7111
Valentina AlfonsiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-0399
Ludovica AnnarummaBody and Action Lab, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Elisa PellegriniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta FasielloDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-7587
Susanna CordoneFaculty of Medicine, UniCamillus, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Aurora D'AtriDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-0683
Federico SalfiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-286X
Giulia AmicucciDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9975-6497
Michele FerraraDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-7576
Mariella PazzagliaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-7078
Luigi De GennaroDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3613-6631
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic affected oneiric activity. However, only a few studies have assessed the longitudinal changes in dream phenomenology during different phases of the pandemic, often focused on a limited number of dream variables. The aim of the present study was to provide an exhaustive assessment of dream features during total lockdown (TL) and a post-lockdown (PL) period characterized by eased restrictive measures in Italy. We performed a longitudinal study using a web-based survey to collect demographic, COVID-19 related, clinical, sleep, and dream data at TL and PL. Our final sample included 108 participants. The high frequency of poor sleep quality, anxiety, and depressive symptoms observed during TL remained stable at PL, while sleep latency (t = −4.09; p < 0.001) and PTSD-related disruptive nocturnal behaviors (t = −5.68; p < 0.001) exhibited a reduction at PL. A PL decrease in time spent with digital media was observed (t = −2.77; p = 0.007). We found a strong PL reduction in dream frequency (t = −5.49; p < 0.001), emotional load (t = −2.71; p = 0.008), vividness (t = −4.90; p < 0.001), bizarreness (t = −4.05; p < 0.001), length (t = −4.67; p < 0.001), and lucid dream frequency (t = −2.40; p = 0.018). Fear was the most frequently reported emotion in dreams at TL (26.9%) and PL (22.2%). Only the frequency of specific lockdown-related dream contents exhibited a reduction at PL. These findings highlight that the end of the home confinement had a strong impact on the oneiric activity, in the direction of reduced dream frequency, intensity, and lockdown-related contents. The co-occurrence of such changes with a decline in nocturnal PTSD-related symptoms, sleep latency, and time with digital media suggests an influence of post-traumatic stress levels, lifestyle modifications, and sleep pattern on dream changes during different phases of the pandemic. The stable prevalence of fear in dreams and the large frequency of poor sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and anxiety are probably related to the persistence of many negative consequences of the pandemic. Overall, these results are consistent with the continuity hypothesis of dreams.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersCommunicable Disease ControlHumansInternetLongitudinal StudiesPandemicscontinuity hypothesisCOVID-19disruptive nocturnal behaviorsdreamsemotionslockdownpandemicPTSDsleep

Identifiers

PMID35409540
PMCPMC8997831
OpenAlexW4220753553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.