Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Aldo Rosano, Chiara Lorini, Brigid Unim, Robert Griebler, Chiara Cadeddu, Luca Regazzi, Daniela Galeone, Luigi Palmieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Network Analysis of the HLSJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Innovative Methods Used in Monitoring COVID-19 in Europe: A Multinational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aldo RosanoNational Institute for the Analysis of Public Policy, Corso d'Italia 33, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Chiara LoriniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-1857
Brigid UnimDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy.
Robert GrieblerCompetence Centre for Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, Stubenring 6, A-1010 Vienna, Austria.
Chiara CadedduDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-1078
Luca RegazziDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-7687
Daniela GaleoneMinistry of Health, Viale Giorgio Ribotta, 5, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Luigi PalmieriDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-2642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an overabundance of valid and invalid information to spread rapidly via traditional media as well as by internet and digital communication. Health literacy (HL) is the ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information, making it fundamental for finding, interpreting, and correctly using COVID-19 information. A cross-sectional study of a sample of 3500 participants representative of the Italian adult population aged 18+ years was conducted in Italy in 2021. A validated HL questionnaire was employed, including sections on coronavirus-related HL, general HL, sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors, and respondents' lifestyle. Of our sample, 49.3% had "excellent" levels of coronavirus-related HL and 50.7% had "sufficient" (20.7%) or "limited" (30.0%) levels. Although the overall HL-COVID level was high, many participants reported difficulties dealing with COVID-19 information; in particular, participants older than 65 years, with a low education level, living in southern regions of Italy, and with high financial deprivation. Targeted public information campaigns and the promotion of HL are required for better navigation of health information environments. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to improve HL and to prepare the general population for future emergency and non-emergency situations, confirming that HL can be considered a social vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2attitudes and practicesCOVID-19health literacyItalyknowledgerisk factorsrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID35409490
PMCPMC8998061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.