Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35409474›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Social Network Analysis Approach to COVID-19 Community Detection Techniques.

Tanupriya Choudhury, Rohini Arunachalam, Abhirup Khanna, Elzbieta Jasinska, Vadim Bolshev, Vladimir Panchenko, Zbigniew Leonowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanupriya ChoudhuryInformatics Cluster, School of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun 248007, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9826-2759
Rohini ArunachalamMiracle Educational Society Group of Institutions, ViziaNagaram 535216, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-7317
Abhirup KhannaSystemics Cluster, School of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun 248007, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-0558
Elzbieta JasinskaDepartment of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2433-3873
Vadim BolshevFederal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM, 109428 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5787-8581
Vladimir PanchenkoFederal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM, 109428 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4689-843X
Zbigniew LeonowiczFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-3710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning techniques facilitate efficient analysis of complex networks, and can be used to discover communities. This study aimed use such approaches to raise awareness of the COVID-19. In this regard, social network analysis describes the clustering and classification processes for detecting communities. The background of this paper analyzed the geographical distribution of Tambaram, Chennai, and its public health care units. This study assessed the spatial distribution and presence of spatiotemporal clustering of public health care units in different geographical settings over four months in the Tambaram zone. To partition a homophily synthetic network of 100 nodes into clusters, an empirical evaluation of two search strategies was conducted for all IDs centrality of linkage is same. First, we analyzed the spatial information between the nodes for segmenting the sparse graph of the groups. Bipartite The structure of the sociograms 1-50 and 51-100 was taken into account while segmentation and divide them is based on the clustering coefficient values. The result of the cohesive block yielded 5.86 density values for cluster two, which received a percentage of 74.2. This research objective indicates that sub-communities have better access to influence, which might be leveraged to appropriately share information with the public could be used in the sharing of information accurately with the public.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social Network AnalysisCluster AnalysisHumansIndiaMachine LearningclusteringCOVID-19 communitynode metricssocial network

Identifiers

PMID35409474
PMCPMC8997780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.