ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pan-Cancer Multi-Omics Analysis of CAD: Integrating CRISPR and Metabolomics Data to Unravel the Metabolic-Immune Axis and Immunotherapy Response.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- AdipoR1-AMPK axis suppresses breast cancer across molecular subtypes via multimodal cell death pathways, including ferroptosis and apoptosis.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Pathological features of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in Shenzhen, China: a single-center study.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Exploring CISD1 as a multifaceted biomarker in cancer: Implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapeutic response.Genes & diseases · 2025Article
- The assessment of breast cancer biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring: integrated analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Goistrat: gene-of-interest-based sample stratification for the evaluation of functional differences.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Their Potential in the Treatment of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Proteomics techniques in protein biomarker discovery.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Review
- Advancing cancer therapy: new frontiers in targeting DNA damage response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Causal Relationship between Immune Cells and Gynecological Cancers through Bidirectional and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analyses.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations.Discover oncology · 2023Review
- Partial Reduction inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The recent advancements in the early detection of cancer biomarkers by DNAzyme-assisted aptasensors.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Dual BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in an adolescent with syndromic intellectual disability.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Development of the prediction model based on clinical-imaging omics: molecular typing and sentinel lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BRCA1/2 are breast cancer susceptibility genes that are involved in DNA repair and transcriptional control. They are dysregulated in breast cancer, making them attractive therapeutic targets. Here, we performed a systematic multiomics analysis to expound BRCA1/2 functions as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer. First, using different web-based bioinformatics platforms (Oncomine, TIMER 2.0, UALCAN, and cBioportal), the expression of BRCA1/2 was assessed. Then, the R package was used to analyze the diagnostic value of BRCA1/2 in patients. Next, we determined the relationship between BRCA1/2 mRNA expression and prognosis in patients (PrognoScan Database, R2: Kaplan Meier Scanner and Kaplan−Meier Plotter). Subsequently, the association of BRCA1/2 with mutation frequency alteration and copy number alterations in breast cancer was investigated using the cBioportal platform. After that, we identified known and predicted structural genes and proteins essential for BRCA1/2 functions using GeneMania and STRING db. Finally, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed to elucidate the potential biological functions of the co-expression genes of BRCA1/2. The BRCA1/2 mRNA level in breast cancer tissues was considerably higher than in normal tissues, with AUCs of 0.766 and 0.829, respectively. Overexpression of BRCA1/2 was significantly related to the worse overall survival (p < 0.001) and was correlated to clinicopathological characteristics including lymph nodes, estrogen receptors, and progesterone receptors (p < 0.01). The alteration frequencies of both the gens have been checked, and the results show that BRCA1 and BRCA2 show different alteration frequencies. Their mutation sites differ from each other. GO and KEGG showed that BRCA1/2 was mainly enriched in catalytic activity, acting on DNA, chromosomal region, organelle fission, cell cycle, etc. The 20 most frequently changed genes were closely related to BRCA1/2, including PALB2 and RAD51 relatively. Our study provides suggestive evidence of the prognostic role of BRCA1/2 in breast cancer and the therapeutic target for breast cancer. Furthermore, BRCA1/2 may influence BRCA prognosis through catalytic activity, acting on DNA, chromosomal regions, organelle fission, and the cell cycle. Nevertheless, further validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.