Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35408530›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Hydrodynamic Study on Non-Aqueous Soluble Archaeological Wood Consolidants: Butvar B-98 and PDMS-OH Siloxanes.

Michelle Cutajar, Robert A Stockman, Susan Braovac, Calin Constantin Steindal, Angeliki Zisi, Stephen E Harding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biophysical reviews · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle CutajarNational Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
Robert A StockmanSchool of Chemistry, University Park Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Susan BraovacMuseum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Kabelgata 34, 0580 Oslo, Norway.
Calin Constantin SteindalMuseum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Kabelgata 34, 0580 Oslo, Norway.
Angeliki ZisiMuseum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Kabelgata 34, 0580 Oslo, Norway.
Stephen E HardingNational Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-9692
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/ L015633/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butvar B-98 and PDMS-OH both have a demonstrable ability as consolidants for archaeological wood. This makes them both potential treatment options for the Oseberg collection, which is one of the most important archaeological finds from the Viking era. Both Butvar B-98 and PDMS-OH are soluble in organic solvents, offering a useful alternative to aqueous-based consolidants. Extensive characterisation studies were carried out on both of these polymers, with the use of analytical ultracentrifugation and viscometry, for the benefit of conservators wanting to know more about the physical properties of these materials. Short column sedimentation equilibrium analysis using SEDFIT-MSTAR revealed a weight-average molar mass (weight-average molecular weight)

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsWoodMolecular WeightPolymersResins, SyntheticSiloxanesUltracentrifugationbutvar B-98PolymersResins, SyntheticSiloxanesanalytical ultracentrifugationButvar B-98Oseberg artefactsPDMS-OH

Identifiers

PMID35408530
PMCPMC9000765
OpenAlexW4220786918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.