ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Classifying Muscle States with One-Dimensional Radio-Frequency Signals from Single Element Ultrasound Transducers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Ultrasound Sensing with Dual Arrays and Machine Learning for Real-Time Tremor Characterization and Antagonist Muscle Monitoring.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2026Article
- Insights into motor impairment assessment using myographic signals with artificial intelligence: a scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Estimation of joint torque in dynamic activities using wearable A-mode ultrasound.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Flexible Ultrasonic Transducers for Wearable Biomedical Applications: A Review on Advanced Materials, Structural Designs, and Future Prospects.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliable assessment of muscle states, such as contracted muscles vs. non-contracted muscles or relaxed muscles vs. fatigue muscles, is crucial in many sports and rehabilitation scenarios, such as the assessment of therapeutic measures. The goal of this work was to deploy machine learning (ML) models based on one-dimensional (1-D) sonomyography (SMG) signals to facilitate low-cost and wearable ultrasound devices. One-dimensional SMG is a non-invasive technique using 1-D ultrasound radio-frequency signals to measure muscle states and has the advantage of being able to acquire information from deep soft tissue layers. To mimic real-life scenarios, we did not emphasize the acquisition of particularly distinct signals. The ML models exploited muscle contraction signals of eight volunteers and muscle fatigue signals of 21 volunteers. We evaluated them with different schemes on a variety of data types, such as unprocessed or processed raw signals and found that comparatively simple ML models, such as Support Vector Machines or Logistic Regression, yielded the best performance w.r.t. accuracy and evaluation time. We conclude that our framework for muscle contraction and muscle fatigue classifications is very well-suited to facilitate low-cost and wearable devices based on ML models using 1-D SMG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.