ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Identification of Characteristic Points in Multivariate Physiological Signals by Sensor Fusion and Multi-Task Deep Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of a multisensor wearable device (SOUNDI) for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of characteristic points in physiological signals, such as the peak of the R wave in the electrocardiogram and the peak of the systolic wave of the photopletismogram, is a fundamental step for the quantification of clinical parameters, such as the pulse transit time. In this work, we presented a novel neural architecture, called eMTUnet, to automate point identification in multivariate signals acquired with a chest-worn device. The eMTUnet consists of a single deep network capable of performing three tasks simultaneously: (i) localization in time of characteristic points (labeling task), (ii) evaluation of the quality of signals (classification task); (iii) estimation of the reliability of classification (reliability task). Preliminary results in overnight monitoring showcased the ability to detect characteristic points in the four signals with a recall index of about 1.00, 0.90, 0.90, and 0.80, respectively. The accuracy of the signal quality classification was about 0.90, on average over four different classes. The average confidence of the correctly classified signals, against the misclassifications, was 0.93 vs. 0.52, proving the worthiness of the confidence index, which may better qualify the point identification. From the achieved outcomes, we point out that high-quality segmentation and classification are both ensured, which brings the use of a multi-modal framework, composed of wearable sensors and artificial intelligence, incrementally closer to clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.