ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Denoising for 3D Point Cloud Based on Regularization of a Statistical Low-Dimensional Manifold.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on a 3D Point Cloud Map Learning Algorithm Based on Point Normal Constraints.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- LiDAR point cloud denoising for individual tree extraction based on the Noise4Denoise.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A point cloud obtained by stereo matching algorithm or three-dimensional (3D) scanner generally contains much complex noise, which will affect the accuracy of subsequent surface reconstruction or visualization processing. To eliminate the complex noise, a new regularization algorithm for denoising was proposed. In view of the fact that 3D point clouds have low-dimensional structures, a statistical low-dimensional manifold (SLDM) model was established. By regularizing its dimensions, the denoising problem of the point cloud was expressed as an optimization problem based on the geometric constraints of the regularization term of the manifold. A low-dimensional smooth manifold model was constructed by discrete sampling, and solved by means of a statistical method and an alternating iterative method. The performance of the denoising algorithm was quantitatively evaluated from three aspects, i.e., the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean square error (MSE) and structural similarity (SSIM). Analysis and comparison of performance showed that compared with the algebraic point-set surface (APSS), non-local denoising (NLD) and feature graph learning (FGL) algorithms, the mean SNR of the point cloud denoised using the proposed method increased by 1.22 DB, 1.81 DB and 1.20 DB, respectively, its mean MSE decreased by 0.096, 0.086 and 0.076, respectively, and its mean SSIM decreased by 0.023, 0.022 and 0.020, respectively, which shows that the proposed method is more effective in eliminating Gaussian noise and Laplace noise in common point clouds. The application cases showed that the proposed algorithm can retain the geometric feature information of point clouds while eliminating complex noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.