ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
De-Identification Mechanism of User Data in Video Systems According to Risk Level for Preventing Leakage of Personal Healthcare Information.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A problem with biometric information is that it is more sensitive to external leakage, because it is information that cannot be changed immediately compared to general authentication methods. Regarding facial information, a case in which authentication was permitted by facial information output by a 3D printer was found. Therefore, a method for minimizing the leakage of biometric information to the outside is required. In this paper, different levels of identification information according to the authority of the user are provided by the de-identification of metadata and face information in stages. For face information and metadata, the level of de-identification is determined and achieved according to the risk level of the de-identified subject. Then, we propose a mechanism to minimize the leakage path by preventing reckless data access by classifying access rights to unidentified data according to four roles. The proposed mechanism provides only differentially de-identified data according to the authority of the accessor, and the required time to perform the de-identification of one image was, on average, 3.6 ms for 300 datapoints, 3.5 ms for 500 datapoints, and 3.47 ms for 1000 datapoints. This confirmed that the required execution time was shortened in proportion to the increase in the size of the dataset. The results for the metadata were similar, and it was confirmed that it took 4.3 ms for 300 cases, 3.78 ms for 500 cases, and 3.5 ms for 1000 cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.