Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35408084›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Conception of Test Fields for Fast Geometric Calibration of the FLIR VUE PRO Thermal Camera for Low-Cost UAV Applications.

Anna Fryskowska-Skibniewska, Paulina Delis, Michal Kedzierski, Dominik Matusiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Fryskowska-SkibniewskaDepartment of Imagery Intelligence, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-8092
Paulina DelisDepartment of Imagery Intelligence, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4360-654X
Michal KedzierskiDepartment of Imagery Intelligence, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0684-3717
Dominik MatusiakDepartment of Imagery Intelligence, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

Military University of Technology in Warsaw 531-4000-22-796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic evolution of photogrammetry led to the development of numerous methods of geometric calibration of cameras, which are mostly based on building flat targets (fields) with features that can be distinguished in the images. Geometric calibration of thermal cameras for UAVs is an active research field that attracts numerous researchers. As a result of their low price and general availability, non-metric cameras are being increasingly used for measurement purposes. Apart from resolution, non-metric sensors do not have any other known parameters. The commonly applied process is self-calibration, which enables the determining of the approximate elements of the camera's interior orientation. The purpose of this work was to analyze the possibilities of geometric calibration of thermal UAV cameras using proposed test field patterns and materials. The experiment was conducted on a FLIR VUE PRO thermal camera dedicated to UAV platforms. The authors propose the selection of various image processing methods (histogram equalization, thresholding, brightness correction) in order to improve the quality of the thermograms. The consecutive processing methods resulted in over 80% effectiveness on average by 94%, 81%, and 80 %, respectively. This effectiveness, for no processing and processing with the use of the filtering method, was: 42% and 38%, respectively. Only high-pass filtering did not improve the obtained results. The final results of the proposed method and structure of test fields were verified on chosen geometric calibration algorithms. The results of fast and low-cost calibration are satisfactory, especially in terms of the automation of this process. For geometric correction, the standard deviations for the results of specific methods of thermogram sharpness enhancement are two to three times better than results without any correction.

Indexed as

calibration targetcamera calibrationimage processinginterior orientation parametersthermal cameraUAV

Identifiers

PMID35408084
PMCPMC9003006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.