Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35408072›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

General Image Fusion for an Arbitrary Number of Inputs Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Yifan Xiao, Zhixin Guo, Peter Veelaert, Wilfried Philips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifan XiaoDepartment of Telecommunications and Information Processing, IPI-IMEC, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-6394
Zhixin GuoDepartment of Telecommunications and Information Processing, IPI-IMEC, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VeelaertDepartment of Telecommunications and Information Processing, IPI-IMEC, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-9087
Wilfried PhilipsDepartment of Telecommunications and Information Processing, IPI-IMEC, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201806220060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a unified and flexible framework for general image fusion tasks, including multi-exposure image fusion, multi-focus image fusion, infrared/visible image fusion, and multi-modality medical image fusion. Unlike other deep learning-based image fusion methods applied to a fixed number of input sources (normally two inputs), the proposed framework can simultaneously handle an arbitrary number of inputs. Specifically, we use the symmetrical function (e.g., Max-pooling) to extract the most significant features from all the input images, which are then fused with the respective features from each input source. This symmetry function enables permutation-invariance of the network, which means the network can successfully extract and fuse the saliency features of each image without needing to remember the input order of the inputs. The property of permutation-invariance also brings convenience for the network during inference with unfixed inputs. To handle multiple image fusion tasks with one unified framework, we adopt continual learning based on Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) for different fusion tasks. Subjective and objective experiments on several public datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods on multiple image fusion tasks.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerRecordscontinual learningimage fusionmultiple inputspermutation-invariant network

Identifiers

PMID35408072
PMCPMC9002723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.