ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
The Relevance in the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for sarcopenia risk using SARC-F and its relationship with laboratory parameters in primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index predicts sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to clarify the relevance in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the SARC-F score in patients with gastrointestinal diseases (G-Ds, n = 672, median age = 73 years). Univariate and multivariate analysis for the SARC-F score were performed. Advanced malignancy was identified in 162 patients (24.1%). The median of NLR for all cases was 2.65. The median of NLR in ECOG-PS 0 (n = 436), 1 (n = 128), 2 (n = 49) and 3 or 4 (n = 59) was 2.26, 2.97, 4.41 and 5.99 (overall p < 0.0001). NLR had a significant correlation with the SARC-F score (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). The median of NLR in the SARC-F score ≥4 (recommended value for sarcopenia, n = 84) and <4 (n = 588) was 5.87 and 2.48 (p < 0.0001). In all subgroup analyses, similar trends were seen. In the multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS (p < 0.0001) and NLR (p < 0.0001) were independent factors, while age had a trend for significance (p = 0.0686). In conclusion, we would like to emphasize the usefulness of NLR, a simple marker assessed only by blood tests, in predicting the possibility for sarcopenia by the SARC-F in G-Ds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.