Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35407593›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Post-Procedural Follow-Up of the Interventional Radiology's Management of Osteoid Osteomas and Osteoblastomas.

Chiara Acanfora, Enrico Grassi, Giuliana Giacobbe, Marilina Ferrante, Vincenza Granata, Antonio Barile, Salvatore Cappabianca

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara AcanforaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Science, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-8277
Enrico GrassiDivision of Radiology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giuliana GiacobbeDivision of Radiology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Marilina FerranteDivision of Radiology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Antonio BarileDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Science, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-3583
Salvatore CappabiancaDivision of Radiology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family of painful osteocytic tumors includes osteoblastomas and osteoid osteomas-these lesions are considered benign, but they could produce a significant painful symptomatology. Usually, people affected are between 20 s and 30 s. When symptomatic, an effective treatment is mandatory for the management of these lesions to allow for a ful quality of life. The possibilities of treatment range from chirurgical en-block resection (procedure of surgical oncology aiming to remove a tumoral mass in its entirety, completely surrounded by a continuous layer of healthy tissue) to interventional approaches that, nowadays, are considered the most affordable and sustainable in terms of effectiveness, recovery after procedure, and for bone structure sparing. The main techniques used for osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas are radio frequency ablation (RFA) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS): the most important difference between these approaches is the needleless approach of MRgFUS, which further reduces the minimal invasiveness of RFA (and the related consequences) and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. Despite their high efficacy, a recurrence of pathology may occur due to a failure in therapy. In light of this, describing the various possibilities of follow up protocols and the imaging aspects of recurrence or incomplete treatment is mandatory. In the scenario given in the literature, many authors have tried to asses an organized follow up protocol of these patients, but many of them did not undergo periodical magnetic resonance (MR) or computerized tomography (CT) because of the lack of symptomatology. However, even if it seems that clinical evolution is central, different papers describe the protocol useful to detect eventual relapse. The aim of our manuscript is to review the various possibilities of follow-up of these patients and to bring together the most salient aspects found during the management of these osteocytic bone lesions.

Indexed as

ablationfollow-upinterventional radiologyMRgFUSosteoblastomaosteocytic tumorosteoid osteomaradiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID35407593
PMCPMC8999856
OpenAlexW4223612560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.