ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Safety, Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Treated with the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device for Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Periprocedural echocardiographic guidance for transcatheter paravalvular leak closure: from patient selection to follow-up.Journal of echocardiography · 2026Review
- Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: clinical outcomes and practical insights from a single-center experience in Japan.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Amplatzer-Based Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Narrative Review of Device Design, Procedural Strategy, Safety, and Outcomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Step-by-Step Guide.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Successful Transcatheter Amplatzer Repair of Severe Paravalvular Leak Following Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- Transcatheter or surgical treatment of paravalvular leaks: A meta-analysis of 13 studies and 2003 patients.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Review
- Case Report: Moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak regurgitation after recurrent prosthetic valve endocarditis in a patient with a double-chambered right ventricle associated with a restricted membranous ventricular septal defect.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the international PLUGinTAVI Registry.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Procedural Tools and Technics for Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Lessons from a Decade of Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Percutaneous Closure of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Long-Term Results in a Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Paravalvular Leakages after Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement and after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation: Strategies to Increase the Success Rate of Percutaneous Closure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Between December 2014 and March 2021, 144 patients with aortic (Ao) or mitral (Mi) paravalvular leaks (PVLs) were enrolled at 21 sites in 10 countries. Safety data were available for 137 patients, who were included in the safety analysis fraction (SAF), 93 patients with Mi PVLs and 44 patients with Ao PVLs. The full analysis set (FAS) comprised 112 patients with available stratum (aortic/mitral leak) as well as baseline (BL), 180-day or later assessments (2 years). Procedural success (implantation of the device with a proper closure of the PVL, defined as reduction in paravalvular regurgitation of ≥one grade as assessed by echocardiography post implantation) was achieved in 91.3% of FAS patients with Mi PVLs and in 90.0% of those with Ao PVLs. The proportion of patients suffering from significant or severe heart failure (HF), classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, decreased from 80% at baseline to 14.1% at 2-year follow-up (FAS). The proportion of FAS patients needing hemolysis-related blood transfusion decreased from 35.5% to 3.8% and from 8.1% to 0% in Mi patients and Ao patients, respectively. In total, 35 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 27 patients (19.7%) of the SAF population. The SAEs considered possibly or probably related to the device included device embolization (three patients), residual leak (two patients) and vascular complication (one patient). During follow-up, 12/137 (8.8%) patients died, but none of the deaths was considered to be device-related. Patients implanted with the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) showed long-lasting improvements in clinical parameters, including NYHA class and a reduced dependency on hemolysis-related blood transfusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.