Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35407501›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Impact of an Operating Room Nurse Preoperative Dialogue on Anxiety, Satisfaction and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Visceral Surgery-A Single Center, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patricia Dias, Daniel Clerc, Maria Goreti da Rocha Rodrigues, Nicolas Demartines, Fabian Grass, Martin Hübner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia DiasSchool of Health Sciences Western Switzerland-HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel ClercDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-3312
Maria Goreti da Rocha RodriguesSchool of Health Sciences-HESAV, Western Switzerland-HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-8345
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-3114
Fabian GrassDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-2879
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-8279
University of Lausanne · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anxiety is common before surgery and known to negatively impact recovery from surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a preoperative nurse dialogue on a patient’s anxiety, satisfaction and early postoperative outcomes. Method: This 1:1 randomized controlled trial compared patients undergoing major visceral surgery after a semistructured preoperative nurse dialogue (interventional group: IG) to a control group (CG) without nursing intervention prior to surgery. Anxiety was measured with the autoevaluation scale State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Y-form) pre and postoperatively. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) In-Patsat32 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction at discharge. Further outcomes included postoperative pain (visual analogue scale: VAS 0−10), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), opiate consumption and length of stay (LOS). Results: Over a period of 6 months, 35 participants were randomized to either group with no drop-out or loss to follow-up (total n = 70). The median score of preoperative anxiety was 40 (IQR 33−55) in the IG vs. 61 (IQR 52−68) in the CG (p < 0.001). Postoperative anxiety levels were comparable 34 (IQR 25−46) vs. 32 (IQR 25−44) for IG and CG, respectively (p = 0.579). The IG did not present higher overall satisfaction (90 ± 15 vs. 82.9 ± 16, p = 0.057), and pain at Day 2 was similar (1.3 ± 1.7 vs. 2 ± 1.9, p = 0.077), while opiate consumption, PONV levels and LOS were comparable. Conclusion: A preoperative dialogue with a patient-centered approach helped to reduce preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing major visceral surgery.

Indexed as

perioperative nurse dialogueperioperative nursingpostoperative outcomespreoperative anxietysurgery outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35407501
PMCPMC8999599
OpenAlexW4220727909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.