Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35407458›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Hospital at Home for Elderly COVID-19 Patients: A Preliminary Report with 100 Patients.

Yuki Miyamoto, Tasuku Matsuyama, Katsutomo Kunimitsu, Hiroyuki Nagano, Yoshie Yamada, Shigemi Murakami, Yoshihiro Yamahata, Bon Ohta, Yoshiki Morikami, Masanori Nakagawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki MiyamotoDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0145-0121
Tasuku MatsuyamaDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-0306
Katsutomo KunimitsuDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Hiroyuki NaganoYoshiki Home Care Clinic, Kyoto 6158262, Japan.
Yoshie YamadaYoshiki Home Care Clinic, Kyoto 6158262, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0424-3750
Shigemi MurakamiWatanabe Nishigamo Home Care Clinic, Kyoto 6038832, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9463-4386
Yoshihiro YamahataDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-741X
Bon OhtaDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Yoshiki MorikamiYoshiki Home Care Clinic, Kyoto 6158262, Japan.
Masanori NakagawaDepartment of Health and Welfare, Kyoto Prefectural Government, Kyoto 6028570, Japan.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPKyoto Prefectural Police · JP

Funding

the Trust Capital Foundation Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital-at-home (HaH) care is useful for patients with COVID-19 and an alternative strategy when hospital capacity is under pressure due to patient surges. However, the efficacy and safety of HaH in elderly patients with COVID-19 remain unknown. In Kyoto city, we conducted a retrospective medical record review of HaH care focused on elderly COVID-19 patients from 4 February to 25 June 2021. Eligible patients were (1) COVID-19 patients aged ≥70 years and those who lived with them or (2) COVID-19 patients aged <70 years with special circumstances and those who lived with them. During the study period, 100 patients received HaH care. Their median age was 76 years (interquartile range 56−83), and 65% were over 70 years. Among 100 patients, 36 (36%) had hypoxia (oxygen saturation ≤ 92%), 21 (21%) received steroid medication, and 34 (34%) received intravenous fluids. Although 22 patients were admitted to the hospital and 3 patients died there, no patients died during HaH care. HaH care may be safe and effective in elderly patients with COVID-19. Our study shows that HaH provides an alternative strategy for treating COVID-19 patients and can reduce the healthcare burden at hospitals.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestCOVID-19elderlyhealthcare burdenhome care medicinehome deathhospital at homepatient surge

Identifiers

PMID35407458
PMCPMC8999675
OpenAlexW4220984448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.