ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Current Status of Robot-Assisted Revisional Bariatric Surgery.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI): feasibility and one-year outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic 3-arm Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a feasible, safe and cost-effective approach based on patient selection.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Indications and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Conversional Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Disparities in Bariatric Surgery Outcomes: A Regional Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Predictors and Outcomes Associated with Bariatric Robotic Delivery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 318,151 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Trajectory of Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Open to Laparoscopic to Robotic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2023Article
- Editorial comment: Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve-to-Gastric Bypass Conversion: A Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to be effective in achieving significant weight loss and remission of obesity-related comorbidities. However, a percentage of patients fail to lose enough weight, regain weight, or experience postoperative complications, requiring additional interventions. Revisional bariatric surgeries (RBS) involve the wide spectrum of procedures that aim to treat complications of the index operation or achieve further weight loss. These are technically challenging procedures due to adhesions of the internal organs, reduced working space, and a distorted anatomy. Indications, timing, and type of operation for RBS are not standardized, and there is no consensus on the best surgical approach. Some authors claim a robotic platform could be advantageous in these types of procedures that are performed in reduced, deep operating fields, or those requiring precision and accuracy. This review examines the most current and representative literature on the outcomes of robot-assisted RBS. Included studies demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach for RBS. However, long operative times and high costs remain major drawbacks of the device. Finally, if we consider that many centers have not yet completed the learning curve for robot-assisted RBS, the potential for improved outcomes seems promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.