Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406790›Full record

SynthesisCells2022

Raman Spectroscopy as a Neuromonitoring Tool in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Clinical Perspectives.

Andrew R Stevens, Clarissa A Stickland, Georgia Harris, Zubair Ahmed, Pola Goldberg Oppenheimer, Antonio Belli, David J Davies

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Raman Spectroscopy as a Tool to Study the Pathophysiology of Brain Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew R StevensNeuroscience, Trauma and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-133X
Clarissa A SticklandSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Georgia HarrisSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8826-7057
Zubair AhmedNeuroscience, Trauma and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6267-6442
Pola Goldberg OppenheimerSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-4724
Antonio BelliNeuroscience, Trauma and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
David J DaviesNeuroscience, Trauma and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant global health problem, for which no disease-modifying therapeutics are currently available to improve survival and outcomes. Current neuromonitoring modalities are unable to reflect the complex and changing pathophysiological processes of the acute changes that occur after TBI. Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a powerful, label-free, optical tool which can provide detailed biochemical data in vivo. A systematic review of the literature is presented of available evidence for the use of RS in TBI. Seven research studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria with all studies being performed in pre-clinical models. None of the studies reported the in vivo application of RS, with spectral acquisition performed ex vivo and one performed in vitro. Four further studies were included that related to the use of RS in analogous brain injury models, and a further five utilised RS in ex vivo biofluid studies for diagnosis or monitoring of TBI. RS is identified as a potential means to identify injury severity and metabolic dysfunction which may hold translational value. In relation to the available evidence, the translational potentials and barriers are discussed. This systematic review supports the further translational development of RS in TBI to fully ascertain its potential for enhancing patient care.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticHumansSpectrum Analysis, Ramanmetabolic dysfunctionneuroinflammationneuromonitoringoxidative stresspoint-of-care diagnosticsRaman spectroscopytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35406790
PMCPMC8997459
OpenAlexW4223523928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.