ArticleCells2022
Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disrupted Transcriptional Networks in Mammalian Cells Stably Over-Expressing Pathogenic Atrophin-1.Journal of neuroscience research · 2025Article
- Wings of Discovery: UsingCells · 2025Review
- Disrupted Transcriptional Networks by Mutant Atrophin-1 in a Cell Culture Model of Dentatorubral-Pallidoluysian Atrophy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Insights into dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy from a new Drosophila model of disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- The effect of AKT inhibition in α-synuclein-dependent neurodegeneration.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding Nucleotide Repeat Expansion Diseases: Novel Insights fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Sequence composition changes in short tandem repeats: heterogeneity, detection, mechanisms and clinical implications.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Progressive degeneration in a new Drosophila model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- ASOs are an effective treatment for disease-associated oligodendrocyte signatures in premanifest and symptomatic SCA3 mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Progressive degeneration in a newResearch square · 2023Article
- Lysine 117 on ataxin-3 modulates toxicity in Drosophila models of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023Article
- Phenotypic defects from the expression of wild-type and pathogenic TATA-binding proteins in new Drosophila models of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Ubiquitin-binding site 1 of pathogenic ataxin-3 regulates its toxicity inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RNA toxicity contributes to diseases caused by anomalous nucleotide repeat expansions. Recent work demonstrated RNA-based toxicity from repeat-associated, non-AUG-initiated translation (RAN translation). RAN translation occurs around long nucleotide repeats that form hairpin loops, allowing for translation initiation in the absence of a start codon that results in potentially toxic, poly-amino acid repeat-containing proteins. Discovered in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type (SCA) 8, RAN translation has been documented in several repeat-expansion diseases, including in the CAG repeat-dependent polyglutamine (polyQ) disorders. The ATXN3 gene, which causes SCA3, also known as Machado-Joseph Disease (MJD), contains a CAG repeat that is expanded in disease. ATXN3 mRNA possesses features linked to RAN translation. In this paper, we examined the potential contribution of RAN translation to SCA3/MJD in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.