Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406673›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Newborn Screening: Review of its Impact for Cystinosis.

Katharina Hohenfellner, Ewa Elenberg, Gema Ariceta, Galina Nesterova, Neveen A Soliman, Rezan Topaloglu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06027385 (Scientific Basis for a Newborn Screening for Cystinosis and Spinal Muscular Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06027385 nacompletednot on this map

Scientific Basis for a Newborn Screening for Cystinosis and Spinal Muscular Atrophy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCystinose StiftungRan2018 to 2022Enrolled300,000ConditionsCystinosis, Cystinosis, Nephropathic, Spinal Muscular AtrophyArmsmolecular-based screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Extrarenal complications of cystinosis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Development of analytics in newborn screening-from the Guthrie card to genetics].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Katharina HohenfellnerDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, RoMed Clinis, Pettenkoferstr. 10, 83022 Rosenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-8087
Ewa ElenbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6701 Fannin Street 11th Floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gema AricetaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Vall d' Hebron, University Autonomous Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1763-1098
Galina NesterovaCystinosis Research Network, Medical Advisory Committee, Chicago, IL 60045, USA.
Neveen A SolimanDepartment of Pediatrics, Center of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation (CPNT), Kasr Al Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 99 El-Manial Street, Cairo 11451, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8942-1973
Rezan TopalogluDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06610, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6423-0927
Baylor College of Medicine · USCairo University · EGHacettepe University · TRResearch Network (United States) · USRoMed Kliniken · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) programmes are considered to be one of the most successful secondary prevention measures in childhood to prevent or reduce morbidity and/or mortality via early disease identification and subsequent initiation of therapy. However, while many rare diseases can now be detected at an early stage using appropriate diagnostics, the introduction of a new target disease requires a detailed analysis of the entire screening process, including a robust scientific background, analytics, information technology, and logistics. In addition, ethics, financing, and the required medical measures need to be considered to allow the benefits of screening to be evaluated at a higher level than its potential harm. Infantile nephropathic cystinosis (INC) is a very rare lysosomal metabolic disorder. With the introduction of cysteamine therapy in the early 1980s and the possibility of renal replacement therapy in infancy, patients with cystinosis can now reach adulthood. Early diagnosis of cystinosis remains important as this enables initiation of cysteamine at the earliest opportunity to support renal and patient survival. Using molecular technologies, the feasibility of screening for cystinosis has been demonstrated in a pilot project. This review aims to provide insight into NBS and discuss its importance for nephropathic cystinosis using molecular technologies.

Indexed as

CystinosisFanconi SyndromeAdultCysteamineHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPilot ProjectsCysteamineclinical courseCTNS-pathogenic variantsinfantile nephropathic cystinosisnewborn screeningnewborn screening for cystinosis

Identifiers

PMID35406673
PMCPMC8997957
OpenAlexW4220823020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.