Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406627›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Extracellular Vesicles from Uterine Aspirates Represent a Promising Source for Screening Markers of Gynecologic Cancers.

Gleb O Skryabin, Andrey V Komelkov, Kirill I Zhordania, Dmitry V Bagrov, Svetlana V Vinokurova, Sergey A Galetsky, Nadezhda V Elkina, Darya A Denisova, Adel D Enikeev, Elena M Tchevkina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Isolation and Proteomic Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gleb O SkryabinInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-6973
Andrey V KomelkovInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-163X
Kirill I ZhordaniaInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry V BagrovDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1/12, 111234 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6355-7282
Svetlana V VinokurovaInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey A GaletskyInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Nadezhda V ElkinaInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-6016
Darya A DenisovaInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Adel D EnikeevInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Elena M TchevkinaInstitute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoye sh. 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8837-7969
Tomsk National Research Medical Center · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, are key factors of intercellular communication, performing both local and distant transfers of bioactive molecules. The increasingly obvious role of EVs in carcinogenesis, similarity of molecular signatures with parental cells, precise selection and high stability of cargo molecules make exosomes a promising source of liquid biopsy markers for cancer diagnosis. The uterine cavity fluid, unlike blood, urine and other body fluids commonly used to study EVs, is of local origin and therefore enriched in EVs secreted by cells of the female reproductive tract. Here, we show that EVs, including those corresponding to exosomes, could be isolated from individual samples of uterine aspirates (UA) obtained from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and healthy donors using the ultracentrifugation technique. First, the conducted profiling of small RNAs (small RNA-seq) from UA-derived EVs demonstrated the presence of non-coding RNA molecules belonging to various classes. The analysis of the miRNA content in EVs from UA performed on a pilot sample revealed significant differences in the expression levels of a number of miRNAs in EVs obtained from EOC patients compared to healthy individuals. The results open up prospects for using UA-derived EVs as a source of markers for the diagnostics of gynecological cancers, including EOC.

Indexed as

ExosomesExtracellular VesiclesMicroRNAsNeoplasmsBiomarkersEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansUterusBiomarkersMicroRNAsexosomesextracellular vesiclesmiRNAovarian cancersmall RNA sequencinguterine aspirates

Identifiers

PMID35406627
PMCPMC8997481
OpenAlexW4221006617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.