ReviewCancers2022
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Resectable Retroperitoneal Sarcomas-Looking Forward.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative radiotherapy combined with surgery versus surgery alone for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and retroperitoneum; a systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A National Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- Successful Management of Recurrent Rectal Leiomyosarcoma: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Opportunities for Multimodality Treatment, Including Systemic Therapy.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Multidisciplinary Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Feasibility and safety study of ultra-hypofractionated neoadjuvant radiotherapy to margins-at-risk in retroperitoneal sarcoma.Radiation oncology journal · 2025Article
- Challenges and hope: latest research trends in the clinical treatment and prognosis of liposarcoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal Tumor Management: Integrating Surgical and Non-Surgical Strategies in Different Clinical Scenarios.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review
- Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Identification of predictors for short-term recurrence: comprehensive analysis of 296 retroperitoneal liposarcoma cases.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Observational
- Data Dissemination of the Role of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A CTOS and CSSO Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Review
- The Landscape of Immunotherapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cornerstone of therapy for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) is complete surgical resection, best achieved by resecting the tumor en bloc with adherent structures even if not overtly infiltrated. Until recently, trials designed to elucidate the role of neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for RPS have been unable to achieve sufficient enrollment. The completion of the STRASS trial, which explored neoadjuvant radiotherapy for primary resectable RPS, is a major milestone in RPS research, but has prompted further questions about histology-driven treatment paradigms for RPS. Though it was ultimately a negative trial with respect to its primary endpoint of abdominal recurrence-free survival, STRASS produced a signal that suggested improved abdominal recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with liposarcoma (LPS). No effect was seen for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or high-grade dedifferentiated (DD) LPS, consistent with recent literature suggesting LMS and high-grade DD-LPS have a predominant pattern of distant rather than local failure. These results, along with those from other recent studies conducted at the bench and the bedside, emphasize the importance of a histology-specific approach to RPS research. Recent evidence for patterns of distant failure in LMS and high-grade DD-LPS has prompted the initiation of STRASS2, a study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for these histologies. As this study unfolds, evidence may emerge for novel systemic therapy options in specific sarcoma histotypes given the explosion in targeted and immunotherapeutic applications over the last decade. This article reviews current and recent evidence around neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy as well as avenues for future study to optimize these treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.