Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406593›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma.

Liesbeth Everix, Shankari Nair, Cathryn H S Driver, Ingeborg Goethals, Mike M Sathekge, Thomas Ebenhan, Charlot Vandevoorde, Julie Bolcaen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liesbeth EverixMolecular Imaging Center Antwerp (MICA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Shankari NairRadiation Biophysics Division, SSC Laboratory, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa.
Cathryn H S DriverPre-Clinical Imaging Facility, Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructur e NOC, Pelindaba, Brits 0242, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8562-1639
Ingeborg GoethalsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Mike M SathekgePre-Clinical Imaging Facility, Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructur e NOC, Pelindaba, Brits 0242, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-0625
Thomas EbenhanPre-Clinical Imaging Facility, Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructur e NOC, Pelindaba, Brits 0242, South Africa.
Charlot VandevoordeRadiation Biophysics Division, SSC Laboratory, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-9417
Julie BolcaenRadiation Biophysics Division, SSC Laboratory, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-280X
iThemba Laboratory · ZASteve Biko Hospital · ZAGhent University Hospital · BESouth African Nuclear Energy Corporation (South Africa) · ZAUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous innovative treatment strategies, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains challenging. With the current state-of-the-art therapy, most GB patients succumb after about a year. In the evolution of personalized medicine, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is gaining momentum, for example, to stratify patients based on specific biomarkers. One of these biomarkers is deficiencies in DNA damage repair (DDR), which give rise to genomic instability and cancer initiation. However, these deficiencies also provide targets to specifically kill cancer cells following the synthetic lethality principle. This led to the increased interest in targeted drugs that inhibit essential DDR kinases (DDRi), of which multiple are undergoing clinical validation. In this review, the current status of DDRi for the treatment of GB is given for selected targets: ATM/ATR, CHK1/2, DNA-PK, and PARP. Furthermore, this review provides a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting these DDR kinases to (1) evaluate the DNA repair phenotype of GB before treatment decisions are made and (2) induce DNA damage via TRT. Finally, by applying in-house selection criteria and analyzing the structural characteristics of the DDRi, four drugs with the potential to become new therapeutic GB radiopharmaceuticals are suggested.

Indexed as

DNA damageDNA repair inhibitorsglioblastomamolecular imagingnuclear medicineradiochemistryradiopharmaceuticalstargeted radionuclide therapytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID35406593
PMCPMC8997380
OpenAlexW4223631621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.