Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406567›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Molecularly Targeted Therapy towards Genetic Alterations in Advanced Bladder Cancer.

Jonathan Thomas, Guru Sonpavde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oncogenic and immunological roles of LAMP5 across cancers and its potential utility in bladder cancer.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Landscape of targeted therapies for advanced urothelial carcinoma.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan ThomasLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-8491
Guru SonpavdeLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-9611
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates to the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma, the disease is generally incurable. The increasing incorporation of next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue into the characterization of bladder cancer has led to a better understanding of the somatic genetic aberrations potentially involved in its pathogenesis. Genetic alterations have been observed in kinases, such as FGFRs, ErbBs, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and Ras-MAPK, and genetic alterations in critical cellular processes, such as chromatin remodeling, cell cycle regulation, and DNA damage repair. However, activating mutations or fusions of

Indexed as

Aktcell cycle regulationchromatin remodelingDNA damage repairErbBreceptorerdafitinibfibroblast growth factor receptorgene fusionsMAPKmTORmuscle-invasive bladder cancerPI3Ktargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID35406567
PMCPMC8997162
OpenAlexW4223548443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.