Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406543›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Evaluation of the TCR Repertoire as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Cancer: Diversity or Clonality?

Andrea Aran, Laia Garrigós, Giuseppe Curigliano, Javier Cortés, Mercè Martí

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea AranImmunology Unit, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institut de Biotecnologia I Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9036-2085
Laia GarrigósInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDivision of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1781-2518
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-1583
Mercè MartíImmunology Unit, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institut de Biotecnologia I Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESMedSIR (Spain) · ESUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells play a vital role in the anti-tumoural response, and the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes has shown to be directly correlated with a good prognosis in several cancer types. Nevertheless, some patients presenting tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes do not have favourable outcomes. The TCR determines the specificities of T cells, so the analysis of the TCR repertoire has been recently considered to be a potential biomarker for patients' progression and response to therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The TCR repertoire is one of the multiple elements comprising the immune system and is conditioned by several factors, including tissue type, tumour mutational burden, and patients' immunogenetics. Its study is crucial to understanding the anti-tumoural response, how to beneficially modulate the immune response with current or new treatments, and how to better predict the prognosis. Here, we present a critical review including essential studies on TCR repertoire conducted in patients with cancer with the aim to draw the current conclusions and try to elucidate whether it is better to encounter higher clonality with few TCRs at higher frequencies, or higher diversity with many different TCRs at lower frequencies.

Indexed as

clonalitydiversityimmune-checkpoint inhibitorneoantigensTCRTILstumour-associated antigens

Identifiers

PMID35406543
PMCPMC8996954
OpenAlexW4220878148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.