Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406542›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature.

Pierpaolo Alongi, Riccardo Laudicella, Helena Lanzafame, Andrea Farolfi, Paola Mapelli, Maria Picchio, Irene A Burger, Andrei Iagaru, Fabio Minutoli, Laura Evangelista

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Robust [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Correlation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bench to Bedside Development of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pierpaolo AlongiNuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-1640
Riccardo LaudicellaNuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy.
Helena LanzafameDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7090-4406
Andrea FarolfiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Paola MapelliNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Maria PicchioNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Irene A BurgerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrei IagaruDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.
Fabio MinutoliNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5768-9764
Laura EvangelistaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-9488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the "Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies" tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [

Indexed as

cholinePETprognosisprostate cancerPSMAresponse to therapy

Identifiers

PMID35406542
PMCPMC8997431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.