ArticleCancers2022
Next Generation Plasma Proteomics Identifies High-Precision Biomarker Candidates for Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repurposing the liquid-based Pap test for the detection of ovarian cancer protein biomarkers.Clinical proteomics · 2026Article
- Composite proteomic and metabolomic plasma biomarkers for detection of colorectal, lung and ovarian cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- The uterine secretome initiates growth of gynecologic tissues in ectopic locations: re-evaluating the evidence.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2026Review
- Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Novel diagnostics for improved treatment of gynecological cancer.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Clinical utility of various liquid biopsy samples for the early detection of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Unraveling the potential biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Investigational new drugs · 2024Review
- Comprehensive serum glycopeptide spectra analysis to identify early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Large-scale proteomics reveals precise biomarkers for detection of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.The Medical journal of Australia · 2024Review
- Toward ovarian cancer screening with protein biomarkers using dried, self-sampled cervico-vaginal fluid.iScience · 2024Article
- The role of B7-H4 in ovarian cancer immunotherapy: current status, challenges, and perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- A Targeted Proteomics Approach Reveals a Serum Protein Signature as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Technology for Detecting Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Acyl coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP): An aging- and disease-relevant "autophagy checkpoint".Aging cell · 2023Review
- Development of a Multiprotein Classifier for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Current and Emerging Methods for Ovarian Cancer Screening and Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Data-driven analysis of a validated risk score for ovarian cancer identifies clinically distinct patterns during follow-up and treatment.Communications medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer among women and has a 5-year survival of only 30-50%. The survival is close to 90% for patients in stage I but only 20% for patients in stage IV. The presently available biomarkers have insufficient sensitivity and specificity for early detection and there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers.
methodsWe employed the Explore PEA technology for high-precision analysis of 1463 plasma proteins and conducted a discovery and replication study using two clinical cohorts of previously untreated patients with benign or malignant ovarian tumours (
resultsThe discovery analysis identified 32 proteins that had significantly higher levels in malignant cases as compared to benign diagnoses, and for 28 of these, the association was replicated in the second cohort. Multivariate modelling identified three highly accurate models based on 4 to 7 proteins each for separating benign tumours from early-stage and/or late-stage ovarian cancers, all with AUCs above 0.96 in the replication cohort. We also developed a model for separating the early-stage from the late-stage achieving an AUC of 0.81 in the replication cohort. These models were based on eleven proteins in total (ALPP, CXCL8, DPY30, IL6, IL12, KRT19, PAEP, TSPAN1, SIGLEC5, VTCN1, and WFDC2), notably without MUCIN-16. The majority of the associated proteins have been connected to ovarian cancer but not identified as potential biomarkers.
conclusionsThe results show the ability of using high-precision proteomics for the identification of novel plasma protein biomarker candidates for the early detection of ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.