Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406508›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Organ-Specific and Mixed Responses to Pembrolizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Takuto Shimizu, Makito Miyake, Nobutaka Nishimura, Kuniaki Inoue, Koyo Fujii, Yusuke Iemura, Kazuki Ichikawa, Chihiro Omori, Mitsuru Tomizawa, Fumisato Maesaka and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Takuto ShimizuDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9503-7356
Nobutaka NishimuraDepartment of Urology, Okanami General Hospital, Iga 518-0842, Japan.
Kuniaki InoueDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Koyo FujiiDepartment of Urology, Osaka Gyoumeikan Hospital, Osaka 554-0012, Japan.
Yusuke IemuraDepartment of Urology, Hirao Hospital, Kashihara 634-0076, Japan.
Kazuki IchikawaDepartment of Urology, Takai Hospital, Tenri 632-0372, Japan.
Chihiro OmoriDepartment of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara 630-8581, Japan.
Mitsuru TomizawaDepartment of Urology, Yamato Takada Municipal Hospital, Yamato Takada 635-8501, Japan.
Fumisato MaesakaDepartment of Urology, Nara City Hospital, Nara 630-8305, Japan.
Yuki OdaDepartment of Urology, Nara Prefecture Seiwa Medical Center, Ikoma 636-0802, Japan.
Tatsuki MiyamotoDepartment of Urology, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Hirakata 573-8511, Japan.
Keiichi SakamotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Keisuke KibaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma 630-0293, Japan.
Masahiro TanakaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Kaisei Hospital, Osaka 532-0003, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-0208
Nobuo OyamaDepartment of Urology, Nara Prefecture Seiwa Medical Center, Ikoma 636-0802, Japan.
Eijiro OkajimaDepartment of Urology, Nara City Hospital, Nara 630-8305, Japan.
Ken FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Okanami General Hospital, Iga 518-0842, Japan.
Shunta HoriDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Yosuke MorizawaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Daisuke GotohDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Yasushi NakaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-0372
Kazumasa TorimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Nobumichi TanakaDepartment of Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara 634-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1507-2464
Nara Medical University · JPNara City Hospital · JPHoshigaoka Medical Center · JPKindai University · JPNara Prefecture General Medical CenterOsaka Ekisaikai Hospital · JPOsaka Kaisei Hospital · JPTenri Hospital · JPYamato Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the organ-specific response and clinical outcomes of mixed responses (MRs) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (ur/mUC), we retrospectively analyzed 136 patients who received pembrolizumab. The total objective response rate (ORR) and organ-specific ORR were determined for each lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as follows: (i) complete response (CR), (ii) partial response (PR), (iii) stable disease (SD), and (iv) progressive disease (PD). Most of the organ-specific ORR was 30−40%, but bone metastasis was only 5%. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between responders and non-responders with locally advanced lesions and lymph node, lung, or liver metastases (HR 9.02 (3.63−22.4) p < 0.0001; HR 3.63 (1.97−6.69), p < 0.0001; HR 2.75 (1.35−5.59), p = 0.0053; and HR 3.17 (1.00−10.0), p = 0.049, respectively). MR was defined as occurring when PD happened in one lesion plus either CR or PR occurred in another lesion simultaneously, and 12 cases were applicable. MR was significantly associated with a poorer prognosis than that of the responder group (CR or PR; HR 0.09 (0.02−0.35), p = 0.004). Patients with bone metastases benefitted less. Care may be needed to treat patients with MR as well as patients with pure PD. Further studies should be conducted in the future.

Indexed as

anti-PD-1bladder cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitionimmunotherapymixed responseorgan-specific responsepembrolizumaburothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35406508
PMCPMC8997142
OpenAlexW4221078360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.