ArticleCancers2022
CT-Based Radiomics Analysis to Predict Histopathological Outcomes Following Liver Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Radiomic Parameters for the Evaluation of Response to Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastasis: Findings from the CAVE-GOIM mCRC Phase 2 Trial.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Trial
- Digital health technologies in medicine: evidence, artificial intelligence integration, and ethical challenges.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- An interpretable machine learning model based on MRI radiomics and GAME score for predicting early recurrence after thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Assessing the multi-software robustness of radiomic biomarkers: a three-tool evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Machine and Deep Learning on Radiomic Features from Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Characterization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explainable multi-modal radiomics for early prediction of liver metastasis in rectal cancer: a multicentric study.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Dual-Time-Point Radiomics for Prognosis Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Resection: A Two-Center Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Development and independent validation of explainable radiomics-based machine learning models for prognosis in colorectal liver metastases.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Radiomics in radiology: What the radiologist needs to know about technical aspects and clinical impact.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Machine learning and radiomics analysis by computed tomography in colorectal liver metastases patients for RAS mutational status prediction.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Computed tomography radiomics study of invasion and instability of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground glass nodule.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based radiomics analysis in predicting RAS mutational status using magnetic resonance imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- An Informative Review of Radiomics Studies on Cancer Imaging: The Main Findings, Challenges and Limitations of the Methodologies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Machine Learning and Radiomics Analysis for Tumor Budding Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastases Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Prognostic Assessment of Gastropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: Prospects and Limits of Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development and Validation of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Radiomics Model Using Computed Tomography Features for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical-radiomics models based on plain X-rays for prediction of lung metastasis in patients with osteosarcoma.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to assess the efficacy of radiomic features extracted by computed tomography (CT) in predicting histopathological outcomes following liver resection in colorectal liver metastases patients, evaluating recurrence, mutational status, histopathological characteristics (mucinous), and surgical resection margin.
methodsThis retrospectively approved study included a training set and an external validation set. The internal training set included 49 patients with a median age of 60 years and 119 liver colorectal metastases. The validation cohort consisted of 28 patients with single liver colorectal metastasis and a median age of 61 years. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics on CT portal phase. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests, intraclass correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, linear regression modeling, and pattern recognition methods (support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (NNET), and decision tree (DT)) were considered.
resultsThe median value of intraclass correlation coefficients for the features was 0.92 (range 0.87-0.96). The best performance in discriminating expansive versus infiltrative front of tumor growth was wavelet_HHL_glcm_Imc2, with an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 84%, and a specificity of 67%. The best performance in discriminating expansive versus tumor budding was wavelet_LLL_firstorder_Mean, with an accuracy of 86%, a sensitivity of 91%, and a specificity of 65%. The best performance in differentiating the mucinous type of tumor was original_firstorder_RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation, with an accuracy of 88%, a sensitivity of 42%, and a specificity of 100%. The best performance in identifying tumor recurrence was the wavelet_HLH_glcm_Idmn, with an accuracy of 85%, a sensitivity of 81%, and a specificity of 88%. The best linear regression model was obtained with the identification of recurrence considering the linear combination of the 16 significant textural metrics (accuracy of 97%, sensitivity of 94%, and specificity of 98%). The best performance for each outcome was reached using KNN as a classifier with an accuracy greater than 86% in the training and validation sets for each classification problem; the best results were obtained with the identification of tumor front growth considering the seven significant textural features (accuracy of 97%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 100%).
conclusionsThis study confirmed the capacity of radiomics data to identify several prognostic features that may affect the treatment choice in patients with liver metastases, in order to obtain a more personalized approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.