ArticleCancers2022
Prediction of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Development and Validation of a 24-Month Incontinence Nomogram.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for urinary incontinence after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- The association of smoking with urinary and sexual function recovery following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Pooled it
- Initial results with an absorbable urologic scaffold to mitigate early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: the ARID study.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Association Between the Cholesterol-High-Density Lipoprotein-Glucose Index and Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Nationally Representative Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI based prediction of post prostatectomy urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life: development and validation study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- [First cohort: Robotic radical prostatectomy at the Mexican Institute for Social Security].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting urinary incontinence at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of pelvic floor rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy and continence recovery in relation to surgical technique.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Continence Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy: Personalized Rehabilitation and Predictors of Treatment Outcome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Prostatectomy: Baseline Severity as a Predictor of Improvement-A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical techniques for enhancing postoperative urinary continence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comprehensive review.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- Cystopexy following anterior-approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy enhances early continence recovery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Phenotypic stratification predicts the pace, but not the outcome, of continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and validation of nomogram models for predicting urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large Rehabilitation Center in Germany.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Construction for the predictive model of quality of life in patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a cohort study.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Radical Prostatectomy and Anatomical Controversies: The Urethral Sphincter and the Elusive Continence Mechanisms.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is feared by most patients with prostate cancer. Many risk factors for incontinence after RARP are known, but a paucity of data integrates them. Prospectively acquired data from 680 men who underwent RARP January 2008-December 2015 and met inclusion/exclusion criteria were queried retrospectively and then divided into model development (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts. The UCLA-PCI-Short Form-v2 Urinary Function questionnaire was used to categorize perfect continence (0 pads), social continence (1-2 pads), or incontinence (≥3 pads). The observed incontinence rates were 26% at 6 months, 7% at 12 months, and 3% at 24 months. Logistic regression was used for model development, with variables identified using a backward selection process. Variables found predictive included age, race, body mass index, and preoperative erectile function. Internal validation and calibration were performed using standard bootstrap methodology. Calibration plots and receiver operating curves were used to evaluate model performance. The initial model had 6-, 12-, and 24-month areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.64, 0.66, and 0.80, respectively. The recalibrated model had 6-, 12-, and 24-month AUCs of 0.52, 0.52, and 0.76, respectively. The final model was superior to any single clinical variable for predicting the risk of incontinence after RARP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.