Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406409›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE Cohort.

Mahesh Sarki, Chang Ming, Souria Aissaoui, Nicole Bürki, Maria Caiata-Zufferey, Tobias Ephraim Erlanger, Rossella Graffeo-Galbiati, Karl Heinimann, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Christian Monnerat and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Family Relationships in Commercial Claims Data to Characterize Clinical Events of Patients withAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Development of the PICCOTEAM Reference Case for Economic Evaluation of Precision Medicine.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Identity theft" inFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Mahesh SarkiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-7762
Chang MingDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2817-3865
Souria AissaouiBreast Center, Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, 1752 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Nicole BürkiWomen's Clinic, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2625-7619
Maria Caiata-ZuffereyDepartment of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, 6928 Manno, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-8913
Tobias Ephraim ErlangerClinical Trials Unit, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Rossella Graffeo-GalbiatiOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Karl HeinimannInstitute for Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Viola Heinzelmann-SchwarzWomen's Clinic, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Christian MonneratDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Jura, 2800 Delemont, Switzerland.
Nicole Probst-HenschSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland.
Manuela RabaglioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-1844
Ursina Zürrer-HärdiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Pierre Olivier ChappuisUnit of Oncogenetics, Division of Oncology, University Hospitals of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-9241
Maria C KatapodiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3903-3750
On Behalf Of The Cascade Consortium
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHCABI Switzerland · CHFribourg Development Agency · CHInstitute of Oncology Research · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland · CH

Funding

Swiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-5293-02-2021The Swiss Cancer League KLS-4294-08-2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cascade screening for Tier 1 cancer genetic conditions is a significant public health intervention because it identifies untested relatives of individuals known to carry pathogenic variants associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS). The Swiss CASCADE is a family-based, open-ended cohort, including carriers of HBOC- and LS-associated pathogenic variants and their relatives. This paper describes rates of cascade screening in relatives from HBOC- and LS- harboring families, examines carriers' preferences for communication of testing results, and describes theory-based predictors of intention to invite relatives to a cascade screening program. Information has been provided by 304 index cases and 115 relatives recruited from September 2017 to December 2021. On average, 10 relatives per index case were potentially eligible for cascade screening. Approximately 65% of respondents wanted to invite relatives to the cohort, and approximately 50% indicated a preference for patient-mediated communication of testing results, possibly with the assistance of digital technology. Intention to invite relatives was higher for first- compared to second- and third-degree relatives, but was not different between syndromes or based on relatives' gender. The family environment and carrying pathogenic variants predicts intention to invite relatives. Information helps optimize delivery of tailored genetic services.

Indexed as

family-based cohortfamily invitationLASSOpublic health geneticsTier 1 genetic syndromesuntested relatives

Identifiers

PMID35406409
PMCPMC8997156
OpenAlexW4220664022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.